Matrix Completion Analysis and Discussion

Version:1.0 StartHTML:000000332 EndHTML:000007708 StartFragment:000001688 EndFragment:000007648 StartSelection:000001692 EndSelection:000007639 SourceURL:http://threadcontent.next.ecollege.com/(NEXT(028c9a2644))/Main/CourseMode/Thread/ListThreadsView.ed?courseItemSubID=958359872&courseItemType=CourseContentItem&TopicID=0&   Threads Main View       function setFocus() {        var focusDiv = document.getElementById(“navigationDiv”);        if (focusDiv != null) {            focusDiv.focus();        }    }  var sessionid = “028c9a2644”;      The three-by-four matrix below illustrates two dimensions—the three types of conflict and the four types of psychosocial factors.  
Conflict Perspective
Types of ConflictValuesPersonalityEmotional IntelligenceConflict StyleIntrapsychic    Interpersonal    Group to group    In this assignment, you will identify three examples of conflicts you have experienced, one for each of the conflict types. These examples should be of reasonable substance and can be either personal or professional examples. Begin by writing a brief description of each conflict; then (using a format similar to the above matrix), identify the influence, effect, or impact each of the psychosocial factors had on the particular conflict.Submission Details:By Week 2, Day 3, post your response to the appropriate Discussion Area. Through Week 2, Day 5, review and comment on at least two classmates’ responses.Use the discussion as an opportunity to construct a set of key observations that describe the impact and relationship of the scenarios when viewed across the types of conflict and psychosocial factors.All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.Assignment 1 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Identified three substantial conflict scenarios and described them in depth in terms of conflict events, context, and conclusion.
6
Analyzed each scenario in terms of the four psychosocial factors.
10
Participated in the discussion by drawing conclusions about the results of others’ research, specifically, and by asking questions, providing statements of clarification, providing points of view with rationales, challenging points of the discussion, or making relationships between two and more points of the discussion.
4
Participated in the discussion by constructing and clearly describing a set of key observations that synthesize the impact and relationship of the scenarios when viewed across the types of conflict and psychosocial factors.
12
While responding, justified ideas and responses by using appropriate examples and references from texts, websites, and other references or personal experiences.
4
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
4
Total:
40