A Discussion on the Little Moral Guidance Provided by Virtue Ethics

Whether or not Virtue Ethics provides little moral guidance can be seen to depend upon the sense in which ‘guidance’ is meant – how to act or how to be, and also depends upon whether the guidance it provides is accurate or unreliable. If the theory itself is inaccurate, then the statement must be true.

It could be argued that Aristotle clearly shows that Virtue Ethics does provide moral guidance. When he formulated the theory he intended it to instruct people how to be moral by explaining that humans all aim at the intrinsically valuable ‘eudaimonia’: happiness, and we aim at this by being virtuous. We acquire virtues by practicing them and using our phronesis (practical wisdom) to determine the appropriate virtue to use in each situation. To guide our actions Aristotle also stated that we may observe virtuous people and use their actions to influence our own, because in doing so we are attempting to mimic their thought process which should be virtuous. Therefore we will develop a habitus of virtue. So in this way Virtue Ethics clearly does provide moral guidance as it lays out how one ought to go about being moral.

Yet there is dispute as to how far this actually does provide moral guidance. For instance one key moral issue is stealing; if Paul has the dilemma of whether to steal bread from a local bakery or let his child go without dinner of one evening, then Virtue Ethics has nothing to day. This is the view of Robert Louden, who criticises Virtue Ethics because it gives no clear guidance for specific situations and therefore it is indeed accurate to state that Virtue Ethics provides little moral guidance as in this example it provides none.

However, to respond, the term ‘moral guidance’ need not purely be considered in terms of actions, but also in terms of being. This is certainly how Aristotle saw it, and so would argue that it is irrelevant to discuss actions as moral value does not lie there. We cannot talk in terms of whether an action is moral, but whether a person is moral and in this way Virtue Ethics – as previously discussed – certainly does provide moral guidance.

It could of course be argued that to claim the moral value does not lie in actions, so it is irrelevant to discuss them, is wrong. any theory of ethics which is deontological, for example that of Kant, would argue this, because they claim that acts hold intrinsic moral value, and therefore the inability of Virtue Ethics to determine straight-forwardly whether an act is moral or immoral means that it does provide little moral guidance.

Furthermore it seems ridiculous to divorce the concept of a person being moral from the actions they perform. We naturally identify moral people by their actions and therefore we must all recognise some fundamental level of morality within an action. Even using Aristotle’s principle of following the examples of virtuous people, we can only identify them as virtuous by the actions they perform (as we certainly cannot look at them and automatically gauge whether they are virtuous or not), therefore there must be some truth to the idea that actions hold moral value, or else we would not respond to them in such a way.

Therefore, because of this it can be seen that Virtue Ethics does indeed provide little moral guidance not only because it does not provide solutions regarding how to act in ethical dilemmas, but because it removes and moral value from actions when they are where moral value lies.

However, to demonstrate its shortcomings further, let us assume for a moment that morality is about being and not about actions (agent-centred). Then it could be argued that the statement is wrong because Virtue Ethics succeeds in guiding people to become moral individuals. For instance it has the advantage of being accessible to both secular and religious people as it does not require or mention belief in God. In terms of role models for virtuous behaviour, religious people can use Jesus as an example, believing him to be a real individual, whereas secular people can also use him as an example but treat him as a virtuous fictional character. This is a positive feature of Virtue Ethics because it is of course its purpose, as with any ethical theory, to demonstrate what is moral and in this way it perhaps gives moral guidance.

Yet Virtue Ethics also fails on this very point; the concept of emulating virtuous individuals is flawed because we may believe that we have identified a virtuous person who has just donated £1,000,000 to charity, hence displaying the virtue of magnanimity, however, we are unaware of the fact that he did so in order to call media attention, and tipped off the crew himself therefore displaying the vice of boastfulness. This could lead to individuals being led into following non-virtuous people and so being non-virtuous and immoral themselves. If Virtue Ethics does this, which it clearly has the potential to do, then it does indeed provide little moral guidance.

However, even if we were to assume that Virtue Ethics does provide guidance on how to be, the more important issue concerns whether this guidance is accurate. If it is not accurate then it can hardly be called moral guidance as it does not point to the moral solution.

It is difficult to see how it could be proved that Virtue Ethics is accurate. For instance it relies on humans having a final aim which is eudaimonia – this has no solid evidence. It also relies upon accepting Aristotle’s list of virtues, and this begs the question of how they are justified. It could also be argued that his list is incomplete; he does no acknowledge compassion as a virtue nor is it clear whether or not the virtues are culturally relative. Therefore a theory based upon such unjustified bases can hardly be called accurate and so does indeed provide little moral guidance.

It could be argued that this is not a strong point, because while Aristotle may not have adequately justified his claims, there appears to be no evidence against them and so no grounds for claims of inaccuracy. However, whether it is accurate or not as a moral guide of course depends upon it providing moral guidance, which has already been shown not to be the case.

So, overall it can be seen that whilst it attempts to provide moral guidance, the guidance is – in the case of how to act, vague, and in the case of how to be, misleading. Therefore at best Virtue Ethics evidently does provide little moral guidance.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with MyhomeworkGeeks
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Customer 452773, January 25th, 2024
Human Resources Management (HRM)
excellent work
Customer 452773, July 3rd, 2023
Business and administrative studies
excellent work
Customer 452773, March 9th, 2023
Thank youuuu
Customer 452729, May 30th, 2021
Business and administrative studies
Customer 452773, March 3rd, 2023
Human Resources Management (HRM)
excellent job
Customer 452773, July 17th, 2023
Business and administrative studies
Excellent job
Customer 452773, March 17th, 2023
excellent work
Customer 452773, October 6th, 2023
Business and administrative studies
excellent work
Customer 452773, March 12th, 2023
Business and administrative studies
excellent job thank you Your Score 166.25/ 175- A 1. Current Culture 15% of total grade 18.37 Criterion "1. Current Culture" has textual feedback Criterion Feedback I see interesting points, though, in general they are not about the culture.
Customer 452773, June 4th, 2023
Don't really see any of sources I provided, but elsewise its great, thank you!
Customer 452697, May 8th, 2021
Business and administrative studies
excellent job
Customer 452773, March 12th, 2023
Customer reviews in total
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
Customers referred by a friend
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat

Sometimes it is hard to do all the work on your own

Let us help you get a good grade on your paper. Get professional help and free up your time for more important courses. Let us handle your;

  • Dissertations and Thesis
  • Essays
  • All Assignments

  • Research papers
  • Terms Papers
  • Online Classes
Live ChatWhatsApp