Basic Principles of Supervision

Supervision in terms of reflective practice can be defined as a steady cooperative reflection among a facility benefactor (either clinical or other) and supervisor that is being built upon the supervisee’s usage of his opinions, spirits, and beliefs in a facility happenstance. Reflective supervision accompaniments the aims and performance of an organization. It can be helpful to think about supervision both in terms of development (which is related to ongoing professional learning) and performance (which is related to clinical governance and standard setting).
Principles of Supervision

Be clear about why there is a need for supervision and who has asked for it.
Set a time frame for the supervision session; even a few minutes of focused time can be worthwhile.
Protect the time and space where possible and appropriate; try to ensure there will be no interruptions and that there is privacy.
Ensure that there is confidentiality
Be transparent about the extent to which the supervision is about development or performance; this may need to be renegotiated or stated during the session.

Supervision is for:

Students
Contexts (professional networks in schools, department issues etc.)
Career development

A Question-Based Approach to Supervision: The 7 C?s
The 7 C’s

Conversations

It indicates that discussion is a working tool on its own. Effective conversations not only define the real views of people but these have the ability to generate its new accepting by providing opportunities to people of rethinking and reconstructing their levels.

Curiosity

This is being used to encourage the story of pupils, coworkers and oneself. It includes giving careful devotion to both languages verbal and non-verbal. It also contains inquisitiveness of supervisor on his own responses; criticism sensation , dullness, nervousness, etc.

Contexts

This develops an understanding of the RP’s networks, their sense of culture, faith, beliefs, community, values, history and geography, and how these affect teaching. An important framework is that of how authority is being understood (see below). Who is holding power and how this can be seen by others? The understanding of different contexts of people or administrations included is important in developing effective supervision dialogues and making them effective.

Complexity

It includes understanding of belongings in multi directions. Becoming more interested in interactions/patterns between people and events producing a richer story.

Creativity

It involves in searching means to generate a real version which creates wisdom. It suggests imaginative procedure of mutually building new variety of the story by supervision process.

Caution

It includes the looking for clues by teaching. It involves working with a level of challenge. It is suitable to provide a direct advice.

Care

It incorporates being humble, thoughtful and focused. It means that it ensures that reflective practice in educational environment is approved in a moral context.
Q2: What is a theory? Explain the aims of theory building. As a reflective practitioner, what could be the issues you have to face in developing your own personal theory?
Marks (2 + 4 + 4=10)
What is Theory?
An articulate standard of common proposals used as values of clarification of ostensible relations of definite perceived occurrences.
The aims of theory building
The aims of theory building are:
Explanation: Theory is to explain the concept about what we observe and relationships among concepts. It is to explain what we have seen and how to figure out the problem and to make plan a resource to bring about change. E.g., what produces bad behaviors?
Prediction: Theory is to make prediction related to teaching i.e. if the action A then what will be the reaction B or if A happens B will follow.
Issues in developing your personal theory
There is a lot of stuff that can be incorrect in a theory, and we have to keep an eye on that stuff to minimize errors. Few things are mentioned below to be observed:
Ethnocentrism: Everybody is being brought up in a culture which has been existing earlier than their birth. It effects our thinking very finely and meticulously that we create up discerning “this is the way things are,” rather than “this is the ways things are in this particular society”. As in our society, we have additional problems with sensitivity and dreading aged and loss. People are dubious to change their beliefs unless they have opportunities to critically reflect upon them.
Egocentrism: Next issue can be probable hazard within speculating is particularities of theorist as a person. Everyone elsewhere our culture, has precise facts for one’s life i.e. Genetics, special experiences, education, and so on they disturb our way of thinking, feeling and finally, the way we interpret others. The intention is to learn mechanisms from hitches experts in practice or wish to sustain exchange in knowledge.
Dogmatism: This is third hazard. As human beings, we have a natural conventional affinity: We always consider work done in the past and if we dedicate our subsists to develop a personal theory, pour our core to it, we can be very self-justifying about it.
Misunderstandings: one of the issues can be unintentional inferences: It can be like that you want to say something but loose words that makes your intentions susceptible. That’s why, people will misunderstand you. There are several things that can cause misunderstandings i.e.,

Translation
Neologisms
Metaphors