Patriotism

After reading various examples of the word patriotism and its use in that context it seems that patriotism mostly refers to the love or emotional attachment that a person can have to their country or to where they are from or simply to the place that they were born in. While researching online for various examples of patriotism I came to find out that there are different levels of patriotism. One such example of patriotism is that practiced by those that have unconditional love for their country and will blindly follow the countries policies without opposition and will see others that opposed a certain idea as a traitor or being unpatriotic.

Other groups of people demonstrate their patriotism by demonstrating it in form of certain symbols like wearing and displaying the flag, singing patriotic songs or the national anthem. There are others that show their patriotism by protesting and criticizing the unjust policies of a nation in order to help keep the nation in check and not blindly follow unjust policies. Accord to the dictionary defines loyalty as “the quality of being loyal to someone or something. ” and loyal as “giving or showing firm and constant support or allegiance to a person or institution. However many times a person’s loyalty can be in a conflict. For example if a person is loyal to the United States but the new government starts making decisions that the individual does not agree with now he can keep on following without speaking up because of his loyalty to the government as well or he can protest against poor policies because those decisions made by those in power are hurting the United States. In his mind he is still being loyal to the United States by protesting and help shape better policies but by others he may be seen as a traitor.

To say that patriotism is outdated is to imply that the concept of nation is outdated. For me patriotism is a word, nothing more nothing less, when I feel patriotic I don’t call it patriotism, I call it being human. It is perhaps our disguised patriotism that we fight today in the world, and it will be our disguised patriotism that will lead us into world destruction. Again like I said, patriotism is a word defined differently by diff people.

Who define it the better way, I salute you and hats off to you, those who do it the wrong way, well I can’t do nothing much about it. Patriotism is not something that should be on display only on the 15th of August and the 26th of January or when the country is facing a war. We need to be patriotic in our everyday life. We can be true patriots by becoming good citizens. Simple things like keeping your streets clean, following the traffic rules, refusing to bribe or be bribed. ll these go towards the construction of a better nation. This is patriotism for me – or at least, this is the patriotism that should be shown by a mature country. The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. ” So in order for us to be free then patriots must exist because without patriots the tree of liberty will dry up, and wither away. Leaving us bare, alone and as slaves.

Perhaps the people who said patriotism is an outdated concept, said it while thinking about a lot of different things, that you and I do not see when we read such stuff. In one sense they may be questioning the definition of patriotism as thought by many patriots. Be the change that you want to see in (India) the World. –

MAHATMA GANDHI

A man’s feet must be planted in his country, but his eyes should survey the world. – George Santayana Let me end by saying, as Lord Byron said– He, who loves not his country, can love nothing.

Patriotic ideals and attitudes towards the Great War changed dramatically when soldiers began returning place; the barbarous world sing warfare became evident to civilians. Soldiers excessively began to oppugn their forfeits for their state, since 1000s of deceases were ensuing and there was a sense of lost intent. Furthermore, many work forces suffered from shell daze, whilst those who had died were non seen as baronial, since nil good was achieved or resolved after the war. Prior to soldiers returning place, civilians were incognizant of how barbarous the war truly was, still go oning to utilize old loyal mottos which romanticised warfare. Therefore, war poets who had fought on the forepart saw it as their responsibility to show the harsh worlds, which finally affected their imaginativenesss and poetic technique, go forthing them traumatised and everlastingly unable to bury.

Siegfried Sassoon ‘s ‘Glory of Women ‘ articulates how propaganda enforced a ‘glorious ‘ portraiture of enlisting to the war. Sassoon illustrates the misrepresentation adult females faced sing the romantic impressions of war juxtaposed to its rough world. Work force were killed for no intent, since the original cause of the war had been lost, whilst adult females held the naif belief that work forces were nobly prosecuting heroic ideals. Sassoon argued that the intent of war was lost, which is partially why the loyal ideal dispersed; forfeit was non dignified, since the combat was go oning and nil was altering. Sassoon stated, ‘This war, upon which I entered as a war of defense mechanism and release, has now become a war of aggression and conquering ‘, and he saw the war as being prolonged unnecessarily.

‘Glory of Women ‘ adopts a alone signifier since Sassoon amalgamates both the English and Italian sonnet; the construction itself is hence dry, since the underlying tone is one of resentment and ill will towards civilians. Sassoon emphasises that the loyal ideal and romanticised impression of war is a prevarication entirely enforced by propaganda. The conventional abab rime strategy, synonymous with a typical English sonnet, runs through the two quatrains, which finally express the adult females’ esteem for heroic soldiers and their captivation with war, ‘You love us when we ‘re heroes ‘and ‘You listen with delectation’. However, undertones of acrimonious sarcasm pervade the octave, conveying Sassoon’s antipathy towards the misrepresentation enforced upon civilians, ‘You believe/That gallantry redeems the war ‘s shame’. The ‘You ‘ is turn toing adult females at place, and its changeless repeat segregates the soldiers from society and represents its nescient deficiency of consciousness towards the world of warfare.

Furthermore, the to a great extent dry linguistic communication used throughout the octave, such as ‘Worship ‘, ‘Love ‘ and ‘Laurelled ‘ is mocked by the on-going unenrgetic beat of the verse form, ‘And mourn our laureled memories when we ‘re killed ‘, which alongside the iambic pentameter, highlights the lip service of nationalism. Therefore, the beat and signifier are constructed intentionally in a tight and conventional construction to reflect the unreal composing of prevarications which the populace were led to believe, sing the war as dignifying and heroic.

Sassoon farther attacks the ‘Delight ‘ and ‘Thrill ‘  which civilians felt when told the ‘Tales of soil and danger’; the initial rhyme makes these ‘tales ‘ seem exciting, proposing a fairy tale, which distances the civilians from the black world of the soldiers despairing state of affairs. Furthermore, ‘You crown our distant ardor ‘ and ‘You worship ornaments ‘  suggests knighthood and courage, and the octave besides indicates canonized artificiality; the ‘Decorations ‘, ‘Shells ‘, ‘Crown ‘, ‘Laurel’  are false and mercenary, symbolizing the deceit of war to civilians. The six, conversely, moves from the contrived portraiture of war to its cruel world, following a Petrarchan decide rime strategy, which heightens Sassoon’s intensified acrimonious tone. The octave therefore insinuates Sassoon’s choler, but the Volta, ‘You can’t believe that British military personnels ‘retire ”  obviously expresses Sassoon’s bitterness for the populace’s incredulous attitude towards resigned soldiers and their ‘lack of nationalism. The old ‘Worship’ of the mercenary gear is juxtaposed to the blunt world of the work forces who ‘Run ‘ ( line 10 ) with fright which finally ‘Breaks them ‘, bespeaking that these work forces will either be broken through shell daze or decease; there is no flight from injury. The image stoping the verse form, ‘His face is trodden deeper in the clay’  farther conveys this thought that traumatic memories will ne’er be forgotten. The soldier will be trodden ‘Deeper ‘ as clip base on balls; bespeaking how he will everlastingly be imprinted on the land, yet there is besides a affecting tone proposing that he has been left and forgotten about, which dispels all semblances sing war as a baronial chase.

Sassoon intentionally replaces the conventional rhyming pair featured in the English sonnet by grouping three lines together to exemplify his concluding message, ‘O German female parent dreaming by the fire ‘, indenting the ‘O ‘ to pull attending to these concluding ideas. Sassoon is exemplifying how he has torn down the hatred barrier between the two states and treated them as one; indenting the border separates the German female parent from the English civilians he is mentioning to in the verse form, yet his message conveys that the German female parent would be merely as devastated by her boy’s decease as an English female parent would. Similarly, both states are pressurised by untruthful propaganda, and false thoughts of nationalism. Sassoon therefore saw all worlds every bit, which contradicts the impression of war in itself.

Wilfred Owen ‘s, ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est ‘, likewise conveys the morbid worlds of war, juxtaposing civilians ‘ loyal ideals. Owen vividly depicts a soldier deceasing from a gas onslaught, underscoring how forfeit was non glamourous and epic as propaganda conveyed it to be, but alternatively, it was unpointed and barbarous. Nerve gas causes the person to experience a drowning esthesis, and Owen therefore makes changeless mentions to H2O associated with this deceasing adult male, ‘Sea ‘, ‘Drowning’, ‘Gargling ‘ and ‘Guttering ‘. These sounds are brooding of the adult male ‘Choking ‘, and as we read the verse form aloud, we can literally hear him deceasing. Furthermore, these verbs are distinguished from the other work forces ‘Flound’ring, ‘Fumbling ‘ , ‘Stumbling ‘ which are all actions performed on land. The deceasing adult male in the ‘Green sea ‘ is therefore to the full detached from his fellow soldiers in his death minutes, and the affecting statement from the talker, ‘He plunges at me ‘, farther conveys the deceasing adult male’s despairing effort to make out. However, he is stray and entirely; decease and forfeit are hence non honorable qualities or loyal, but lonely and terrorizing

Owen challenges the conventional poetic signifier, which signifies the dislocation of society ‘s rules and its constituted system. Initially, the verse form looks as though it is written in iambic pentameter, but Owen breaks up the iambic beat with punctuation, ‘But limped on, blood-shod. All went square ; all blind ‘, delegating the verse form with a colloquial tone. However, this confused beat is effectual, since Owen did non desire his verse form to flux swimmingly ; it is intentionally full of ‘Stumbling ‘ and ‘Fatigue ‘, symbolizing a realistic tone of devastation and conveyance that nationalism, and the romanticised image of war, no longer existed.

The soldiers in the verse form are portrayed pitifully, urgently seeking to persist ; this impression is highlighted through the actions of the work forces who are ‘Bent dual ‘ , ‘Marched asleep ‘, ‘Trudge ‘ and ‘Limped on ‘, and the slow beat adds to their sulky motion. The gait of the beat so quickly speeds up in the undermentioned stanza, when person shouts, ‘Gas! Gas! Quick, boys! – An rapture of groping ‘. Two forces are hence working against each other, since the words ‘Fumbling ‘ and ‘Clumsy ‘ suggest the work forces are still trapped in this slow motion, but the usage of exclaiming Markss and the capitalization of ‘Gas!’ implies a sense of urgency and force per unit area. Therefore, the work forces are non portrayed as ‘racing ‘ for their gas masks, foregrounding a feeling of at hand licking and futility, and their apathetic nature towards seting their masks on reveals the atrociousnesss of warfare.

The usage of similes in the verse form are highly effectual; at the beginning of the verse form, the soldiers are compared to old cripples ‘Bent double, like old mendicants under pokes, / Knock-kneed, coughing like beldams’. The work forces ironically juxtapose the fine-looking image of a soldier enforced by propaganda. Furthermore, these gap lines are compared to the stoping of the verse form which portrays ‘Innocent linguas ‘ and ‘Children ‘, which serve as a reminder that these work forces are non aged and crippled, but vernal, and there is nil glorious about the decease of kids. Owen is angry with the deceit of warfare to boys whose lives have merely merely begun and are necessarily being wasted for nil.

A farther simile which Owen uses to convey his choler towards the impression of nationalism is, ‘His hanging face, like a Satan ‘s sick of wickedness ‘. This image suggests that if the Satan is ill of wickedness, which is the chief feature he is associated with, he is efficaciously oppugning his values and manner of life. The ‘hanging face ‘ farther reflects his letdown with his realization that his being has been for no intent. Owen is therefore connoting that likewise, the deceasing soldier is oppugning nationalism and ‘glory ‘ in deceasing, gaining his decease will hold no positive result, and his life has been wasted unnecessarily. Furthermore, Owen could be seen as comparing the prevarications of nationalism and war with wickedness itself.

To reason, Sassoon and Owen provided civilians with the true word picture of warfare because the publicity of deceasing for one ‘s state was unfair, since 1000s of work forces were giving their lives for a lost cause. There was a necessity hence to kill the exploited image of nationalism created by propaganda, and expose the ruthless world of giving oneself to warfare.