Civil Rights Movement in the “Selma” Movie


Hollywood films portraying historical events often use creative freedom for dramatic purposes. As a result, certain depictions may be inaccurate to the reality of the events that occurred. While it may be an appropriate artistic license to use in some cases, specific sensitive and political themes may result in a public controversy if depicted inaccurately. This leads to negative press and an overall adverse impact on a movie’s performance and legacy. While the motion picture Selma accurately presents a powerful image of the Civil Rights Movement at its core, its depiction of federal politics and Dr. King’s interaction with the Lyndon Johnson administration as antagonizing is flawed.


A controversy arose around the movie Selma when Joseph A. Califano Jr. who served as President Johnson’s top assistant published an opinion piece in the Washington Post. He claimed that the film used creative freedom to create drama around the relationship between Martin Luther King Jr. and President Johnson. The Presidential administration is portrayed as an antagonist to the issue of voting rights, openly opposing or seeking to discredit Dr. King. Historically, LBJ was fully supportive of the Civil Rights Movement and considered the Voting Rights Act as a tremendous legislative achievement (Califano Jr.).

Haven’t Found The Relevant Content? Hire a Subject Expert to Help You With
Civil Rights Movement in the “Selma” Movie
Post Your Own Question And Get A Custom Answer
Hire Writer

Role of Presidential Administrations

The Kennedy family and administration were supportive of the Civil Rights Movement and received more than 70% of the African American vote. Kennedy wanted to maintain support of Southern states on key issues, so instead of pushing for civil rights legislation, Kennedy appointed an unprecedented number of African-Americans to positions of power, strengthened the Civil Rights Commission and publicly spoke in favor of desegregation. Over the short-term of Kennedy’s presidency, he helped to make first steps towards equality legislation, protected the famous Freedom Riders and Dr. King’s protests, and sought to integrate universities (“Civil Rights Movement”).

On November 22, 1963, President Kennedy was assassinated allowing Johnson to enter into office. A comprehensive civil rights bill that was long in the making had previously failed to pass. Johnson in his address to the nation regarding Kennedy’s death sought to champion the legislation. He used his considerable legislative experience and connections to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as part of Kennedy’s legacy. He also used his position to form a delicate relationship with Dr. King, investigate murders by white supremacists, and limit violence of street protests and desegregation (Germany). Violence during the first attempt at the Selma march depicted in the film did lead to the introduction of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to Congress. While it seems to have been a reactionary move by the administration, Johnson had ordered the drafting of a robust legislative measure to ensure Black voting rights about five months beforehand. He strongly believed that the Constitution guaranteed the right to vote for every citizen. Johnson helped guide the bill into law and ensured federal intervention in any state which sought to deter African-Americans from exercising their right to vote (Rhodan).

Presentation of the Civil Rights Movement

The movie offers a uniquely powerful and personal perspective on the Civil Rights Movement. It focuses on Dr. King as a human being with his own struggles and weaknesses. The movie shows the desperation that the African-American community felt being ostracized from the voting process and a right to peaceful protest. Two scenes were most memorable in the movie. The first is when a woman is attempting to register to vote and is denied due to pure systemic racism despite showing every intention and privilege to do so. Another is an angry young man calling for armed retaliation against policemen after the attack on the bridge (DuVernay). Both scenes highlight the utmost pain of injustice that has afflicted the Black community.

Califano’s representation of the movement is highly political which is appropriate due to his role during the events. He describes the in-depth political intricacies and strategic planning that served as the foundation for the Selma march and further passing of the Voting Rights Act. His description is factual, detailed, and chronological. It is similar to the description of the Civil Rights Movement in most educational institutions. The movement is taught as a historical occurence based on dates and revolving around a chronological chain of events with essential court cases and legislation to highlight its achievements. Although violence and racism against African-Americans are mentioned in history textbooks, it is often overlooked as a minor detail. Most students are unable to grasp the extent of the systematic racism and injustice in the South which made life for the black community a constant threat and purgatory of abuse.

Unresolved Issues

While outright racism and violence against minorities is illegal and rare today, the concept of covert racism has emerged. The famed Black Lives Matter movement has been created to address the issue of police targeting and unproportionate use of force against African Americans, often with no punishment. Government abuse has shifted to using these tactics which have led to protests for equitable treatment (Packnett). While the African-American community has gained a lot since the events at Selma, there is still a struggle. Black communities experience higher levels of poverty, crime, and poor education rates in comparison to their white counterparts. The civil rights legislation never had a full “de jure” effect on segregation with minorities still lacking opportunities or representation, which translates to funds for development being taken away through legal loopholes (Wolf).


Selma portrays Johnson’s reluctance to be the central driving force for the decision to march. Dr. King is shown to be evidently frustrated and desperate at the president’s refusal. However, the movie fails to show the complexity surrounding the issue. Johnson indeed suggested that the public announcement of the legislation would have to wait. Unlike what was shown in the movie, Johnson recognized the severity of the problem and promised to provide King with every possible legal tool available under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Despite a lack of public announcement before Bloody Sunday, Johnson had mentioned to confidants and hinted in interviews about a potential legislation to ban illegal voting practices. Johnson had experience with legislative timing, and he needed the political leverage to pass a critical tax-cut bill initiated by Kennedy. A proposal of the Voting Rights Act beforehand would have led to a filibuster (which it did), temporarily undermining any other political ambitions of the administration (Kaiser). In a way, the movie was correct about Johnson stating that as a president he has a number of issues to deal with. However, it inaccurately portrays the attitude and lack of a strategic approach to passing the critical Voting Rights Act of 1965. Johnson’s legislative experience and guidance helped to make the bill into law before, during, and after the events of Selma.

The film portrays Johnson distrusting of King and asking FBI director Hoover to discredit the leader. However, Hoover undertook surveillance in hopes of discrediting King independently. Johnson was appalled by this revelation and feared that any accusatory material released to the press would ultimately set back the Civil Rights Movement. Dr. King and President Johnson maintained a cordial and respectful relationship. King believed that Johnson was directing all efforts to solving the issue of civil rights “with sincerity, realism and, thus far, with wisdom” (Kaiser). King had met Johnson while he was still a vice-President under Kennedy. According to Califano, Johnson had always been an avid supporter of civil rights and encouraged King to find a location that had an extremely detrimental voting rights issue that could be used as a ground for demonstration (a strategy attributed to King in the film). Both men had slightly different perspectives on the resolution to the civil rights crisis but believed in a similar outcome. King praised Johnson’s grasp of the complexity of the issue, his dedication to resolving it, and leadership that helped to find a solution (Berman). The two leaders had a historically productive relationship, maintaining open communication and positively pushing each other to play their critical roles in the Civil Rights Movement.


The movie Selma has done tremendous justice to portraying the core of the Civil Rights Movement and the challenges it had experienced. It shows the arduous, deeply personal, and terrifying experiences that the movement’s members had to undergo. However, there is an inherent flaw in its portrayal of Lyndon Johnson administration which sought to create a political antagonist to King’s efforts. Evidence shows that the administration, in fact, played a vital role in the Selma march, enhancing public awareness, and eventually passing the famous Voting Rights Act. This inaccuracy is significant because of the current socio-political environment of racial tension. A movie with comparable motifs, likely to be influential among advocates for social justice, provides a perspective on resolving the issue in a notably different manner than actual circumstances. Therefore, when motion pictures portray historical events with the intent to educate or draw comparisons, accuracy is critical to demonstrating the realities of achieving legislative progress in the United States.

Works Cited

Berman, Eliza. “What Martin Luther King Really Thought About Lyndon Baines Johnson.” Time, 2015. Web.

Califano Jr., Joseph. “The Movie ‘Selma; has a Glaring Flaw.” The Washington Post, 2014. Web.

“Civil Rights Movement.” John F. Kennedy Presidential Library, n.d. Web.

DuVernay, Ava, director. Selma. Paramount Pictures, 2014.

Germany, Kent. “Lyndon B. Johnson and Civil Rights.” The University of Virginia Press, n.d. Web.

Kaiser, David. “Why You Should Care That Selma Gets LBJ Wrong.” Time, 2015. Web.

Rhodan, Maya. “The Voting Rights Act at 50: How the Law Came to Be.” Time, 2015. Web.

Packnett, Britanny. “Black Lives Matter Isn’t Just a Hashtag Anymore.” Politico Magazine,  2016. Web.

Wolf, Richard. “Equality Still Elusive 50 Years After Civil Rights Act.” USA Today, 2014. Web.

Why Hire a Professional Essay Writer from MyHomeworkGeeks

Quality Urgent Essays

Domyhomeworkk online platform provides the best essay writing service ever received elsewhere, thanks to our professional essay writers. Experience gained in the 10+ years of being in the assignment writing industry is also an added advantage.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

A lot is done to maintain us as the best essay writing service provider. Besides owning a degree from a recognized university, a writer must pass the rigorous tests we take them through before they are considered eligible to offer urgent essay help on our website.

Affordable Urgent Assignment Help

Who said a reliable website should not be cheap also? While it is human nature to associate prices with quality, that does not always work. At, we guarantee you cheap and urgent essay help without compromising the quality.

24/7 Available Urgent Essay Writing Service

Whether it is a ‘write my essay for me cheap’ or ‘edit my essay’ order you want to request, always feel free to reach us at any time of the day. Our experts work in shifts to ensure that you access urgent essay writing services at any time of the day.

Plagiarism Free Essays Online

The punitive measures that come with plagiarized content are so harsh, and we understand that. We consequently ensure to write each client’s papers from scratch no matter how urgent the essay is. To acknowledge borrowed content, our quick writer references and cites the work.

Wow Customer Support 24/7

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

So much stress and so little time? Take care of yourself: let us help you with your tasks. We offer all kinds of writing services.


Custom Essay Writing Services

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.


Admission and Business Papers

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.


Editing and Proofreading

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.


Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.

Have a homework question? Get help from verified tutors now!