Contract Between Ping and The Attorney General Questions
I’m trying to study for my Business Law course and I need some help to understand this question.
You summarize the relevant facts in the problem in point form.
What is the big issue (or problem here I want to sort out/solve/settle)?
The big issue is: Is there a contract between Bill and Kiddico?
(or for the Legal Analysis: Is there a contract between Ping and the Attorney General?)
To answer that question whether there is a contract between Ping and the Attorney General we have to ask and answer the following questions about whether or not there is an intention to create legal relations, an offer, whether the offer was accepted, and consideration:
1.Is there an intention to create legal relations?
Take the Bill v Kiddico question:
Bill would argue there is an intention to create legal relations because….
Mention a case that will support Bill’s argument.
.
Kiddico would argue there is not because…
Mention a case that will support Kiddico’s argument.
Conclusion: You answer question 1: There is/There is not/It is unclear/Probably there is/ Probably there is not.
Explain why you picked one side over the other.
2. Is there an offer?
Bill would argue there is because…
Supporting case
Kiddico would argue there is not because…
Supporting case
Conclusion:
3. If there is an offer, was it accepted?
Bill would say he accepted the offer when he….
Kiddico would say he did not accept the offer because….
Conclusion:
4. Is there consideration?
Bill….
Kiddico…
Conclusion:
Summary of your answers/Conclusions to the four questions.