10 Good Persuasive Speech Topics

Table of contents

Attract the reader/listener by good persuasive speech topics

It goes without saying that writing is a fascinating process. Nevertheless, we have to follow some rules in order to make our paper excellent. First and one of the most important things is to attract the target audience as it is the consumer of your good. That is why your task is to create such masterpiece that will be interesting and useful for people of different age. We have prepared for you several basic tips that will transform your writing into the “sweet pie” for readers.

  1. Always give a clear guide to action. No matter how inspiring your performance is, any audience will prefer to learn something immediately, to apply new knowledge in their lives. Inspiration is great, but the use of your material is more important. So do not be afraid to say: “Think about the material today, and do something new tomorrow.”
  2. The topic of the persuasive speech should be relevant, that means that, in science and practice, there is an urgent need for this topic. In the persuasive speech, the first point should be the relevance of the topic of research.
  3. The chosen topic should have a scientific novelty; it means that the applicant could say that he did something new that nobody had done before.
  4. The topic of the work should be meaningful. The results of research on the topic will contribute to a science or practice.
  5. Having adjusted the subject of the dissertation, it is necessary to discuss it with the scientific leader, and then transfer it for approval. It should be noted that the topic of the research may be changed in the course of research, which depends both on the results of scientific research and the development of scientific research.

How to speech ideas, persuasive speeches and speech topics for college students

Most of the students know that the delivering of the thoughts is an art and a crucial skill that we should develop. The persuasive speech is an excellent way to practice such skill because it aims to present how to lead the argument. Such kind of speech can influence the heart of target audience and help to be the winner even if your arguments are not strong enough. This article gives you some good persuasive speech topics that can appeal to the audience and make your debate a huge win.

The kind of the theme influences your unique speech. Remember if the topic hasn’t been investigated yet you will meet difficulties with finding credible sources. Moreover, you should have the interest in your topic as it is boring to write about the things that annoy you. On the other hand, if the topic is too spread it will be complicated for you to find new and interesting facts or sources that haven’t been used. Your task is to find such branch of science and sphere that is interesting for you. The next step is to pick the problematic issue and write the persuasive content. We highly recommend you to use critical thinking while choosing the topic because you have to predict if your favorite theme will be interesting to listeners.

The persuasive speech is a type of literary performing in which the author uses his personal opinions to attempt and adjust the reader’s point of view about the topic. The person who aims to persuade somebody tries to use different devices in order to have success.

There is a dozen of topics college students can choose. They may be connected with law, environment, family, politics, or it can even be policy speech topics. You can write about something connected with illegal immigration: how to tackle it? Or make interest on the next 10 issues:

  • Genetic factors are less important than environment when it comes to intelligence.
  • Is there a reasonable level for a number of plastic surgeries that one person can have?
  • Should countries make fast food networks accountable for obesity population?
  • Ways to fix pension plans.
  • Steroids should not be used by anyone.
  • Working women don’t have to get more privileges than men.
  • The press should be given more rights.
  • Health insurance and its benefits as a mandatory measure.
  • People should not go into space as tourists.
  • Juvenile pregnancy undermines the chances for good future of the mother and child.

You can play with any topic, write or talk about everything in the world. Make sure this topic is close to the speaker and interesting to listeners. For example, you can flash your erudition, and pick up a theme about some unique animal, or unknown inhabitants of the underwater world. You can write about methods of education, and it will be a very successful performance, which will come from the heart.

Types of persuasive speeches. Persuasive speech examples.

There are many types of good speech topics. We want you to take a look at the next ten groups of the best ones:

  1. Religion:

Should prayers be allowed in every school?

The religious diversity.

Different concepts of religion.

The question of religious freedom.

Has occultism the right to leave?

  1. Politics:

Genocide and its consiquences.

Are taxes important for the USA?

The German emigration.

The effects of Affirmative Action.

The advantages and disadvantages of the integration.

  1. Education:

The education for people with disabilities.

The advantages of the homeschooling.

How to avoid school violence?

The necessity of standardized tests.

Gender discrimination at school.

  1. Economics:

The reason for China’s prosperity.

The economic forecast for the next five years.

How the countries deal with the budget deficit.

Will socialism exist in 50 years?

The cooperation of the developed and developing countries.

  1. Health:

The effect of tobacco on the human body.

The pros and cons of vaccinations.

The reason for sleeping disorders.

The harmful effect of fast food.

Is vegetarianism useful for one’s health?

  1. Ecology:

The causes of black hole appearance.

The risk of global warming and its influence.

Is the recycling important?

How to decrease pollution and protect the nature?

The effects of deforestation.

  1. Social media:

Television violence and it’s effect on children.

Can newspapers and magazines be trusted?

Is the freedom of speech a reality?

Should alcohol advertising be prohibited?

The censorship in social media.

  1. Technology:

In what way do computer viruses attack the laptops?

The scheme of the search engine work.

How do video games affect children?

The drawback of the Information Age.

How did mobile phones change the society?

  1. Family:

The immortal family problems?

How to protect children from the harm of the parents’ divorce?

Should same-sex marriages be allowed in all countries?

The age problem of the spouse.

The children of the gay couple?

  1. Social issues:

International race question.

Men and women discrimination.

How to protect the rights?

Is it human to restrict birth rate?

Ways for increasing of adoption?

Nowadays the theme of space is becoming more and more popular, that’s why we want to show you a based on the topic: “Should people be anyhow connected with space?” Hope we will meet all your wishes and expectations.

People are just sand in a huge and vast space. All our lives, all our affairs, problems and joys, ups and downs occur on one small ball, lonely rotating around the star. We do not know much about space; there will pass years, centuries, millennia and humanity will open this long beautiful road into space.

Today the world has become completely different. The International Space Station with courageous astronauts aboard makes 16 rotations every day around the Earth. Space agencies from different countries often launch near-Earth satellites, and SpaceX plans are going to deliver people to Mars by 2026!

We do not cease to improve our knowledge of space and the development of technology, and someday this knowledge will reach such levels, of which even the humanity does not dream of. We do not have the opportunity to fly to the nearest stars, we even hardly go beyond the native Solar system. An infinitely long and beautiful road to space for us is still closed.

Sending the necessary rockets to the near-Earth orbit requires a lot of money, that’s why further development of astronautics depends on the money issue. I think that it’s not necessary to look for expensive and at the same time very practical ways of launching space rockets and ships. It is a pity that the eternal problem of all humanity – lack of funds – also touched the space issues.

Fortunately, you are lucky to use your imagination and pick the topic according to your tastes. Be brave to express your thoughts. The most significant thing is to have enough inspiration to complete the best persuasive speech. Your speech should be full, sustain and interesting for those who will get acquainted with it. Do not postpone and show the creativity and richness of the inner world now. Be sure that your big success consists of the small steps and pieces.

Read more

Self evaluation Narrative Essay

Individual Critical and Reflective Self-Evaluative Paper Course Evaluation; I really enjoyed this course, as I knew I would. I love to debate!! I am a very opinionated person and I used to want to be a lawyer when I grew up Just because I loved to argue so much (such a pleasure for my parents! ). On the course with me were some other girls who had some strong opinions too which was really great because we had some good debates with some strong arguments and points! At the beginning of the course we voted on the topics we wanted for our debates, which meant that we would all be interested in most of the subjects we chose.

Being all irls as well you can image some of the “banter” we had! Even though the class started at 9am, it was always easy to come in because of the group that we had in class; I think it makes such a difference when there is good energy in a work area, it makes it a lot more fun to be in. I enjoyed the class time, especially because the format was very relaxed. The lecture would be more of a discussion where we would talk about certain issues and elements relating to the course. It makes the class much more enjoyable and engaging rather than Just listening to a teacher go on and on whilst the class sits there texting away on their phones.

Personal Evaluation; Being such an emotional person I do find it hard to sometimes control my emotions and I find myself slightly riled up after morning debates! I am generally an emotional person and things get to me quite easily and I need to learn that in business, university and even sometimes my social life I need to Just relax and breathe; its not the end of the world! Having been born and raised in London I like to think that I have a good grasp on the English language and have a good way of expressing myself which has definitely been a useful tool for the debate questions and reviews.

I try to ake on board the constructive criticism because we would all offer a lot of feedback and comments to one another, which is really useful, and I will take those comments to help myself in the future. For the first few debates I didn’t use sources that were credible and the tutor told me that in order to make my statements and points more reliable I had to start using more credible sources. This term I have not been happy with myself academically or personally. I don’t think that I have performed to the best of my ability and I believe that at the moment I am Just living rather than enjoying life nd my time at university.

This is because I have been lazy. I am not back into a routine of being healthy and active and this has a negative affect on the other areas in my life. I want to be more active and involved in what’s going on around London. I want to be able to talk about interesting things IVe done and seen and experience life to the full. I am going to start to be more positive and realise that only I can help myself I aim to change my outlook this upcoming holiday so that I can be on top form for my last two semesters and enjoy this last part of my education. self evaluation By Christianna-psarros

Read more

Affirmative Action Debate and Economics

Yuching Lin ECON 395 The Affirmative Action Debate Affirmative Action has recently become the center of a major public debate in the United States, which has led to the emergence of numerous studies on its efficiency, costs, and benefits. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ended wage and employment discrimination based on gender and race, significantly decreasing the gap between minorities and non-minorities. Minorities made major progress from the 1960s up through the early 1970s due to Affirmative Action (Jones, Jr. 1985). However, for the past few decades, the progress that minorities have made in terms of income, employment and education has largely stagnated. California, Michigan, Nebraska, and Washington State have recently banned racial advantage in employment and college admissions, and Proposition 209 of California has disallowed the preferential treatment of minorities, with opponents of Affirmative Action lobbying for more widespread bans on similar policies while supporters argue fiercely against the removal of Affirmative Action policies.

As can be seen, Affirmative Action’s status in the United States now is very dynamic due to shifting court decisions and policy plans. Additionally, returns to education have been increasing in recent decades, and as a result, income inequality has also increased – the growing demand for highly skilled workers (workers with high levels of post-secondary education) and the stagnancy of American education (with the added fact that high quality colleges have become even higher quality and even more selective while lower tier colleges have decreased in quality) has led to ever-increasing wages for the highly skilled.

This “Skill Biased Technological Change” has led to a widening income gap between the rich and the poor. Naturally, this considerably affects black and Hipic minorities, who are more likely than non-minorities to be part of the working class or below the poverty line, which raises the stakes in the debate on Affirmative Action. Today, both sides on the debate can bolster their arguments with evidence provided by economic and social research on the policies. But there are additional questions to be answered – is Affirmative Action justified on moral grounds? Can we balance economic efficiency with equity?

Is Affirmative Action the best policy for addressing racial inequalities? Do policies that increase diversity result in positive externalities such as reduced prejudice and indirect benefits beyond education and career success? One will discover that, after thorough analysis of research concerning Affirmative Action, it is still difficult to form a definitive conclusion on the results of the policies. Nevertheless, there is much to learn from the research that has been conducted as of present, and one can now better steer research in a direction that will uncover the real benefits and shortcomings of Affirmative Action.

To begin with, the debate on the efficiency of Affirmative Action policies is still very much unsettled. Opponents claim that they actually result in several negative effects on the minorities the policies are intended to benefit, arguing that minority students admitted into overly competitive programs are more likely to drop out than mismatched non-minority students due to the increased competition, which would actually worsen the income gap since black income has been shown to decrease even more than white income after dropping out of college (Loury, 1995).

A proposed “stigma hypothesis” suggests that “preferential treatment perpetuates the impression of inferiority” while simultaneously lowering incentives for high academic effort from minorities (Murray, 1994). And yet another underperformance hypothesis by Steele (1990) suggests that blacks’ academic performance suffers when they are aware that normal standards are lowered in order to accommodate them.

However, there exists no research with strong, conclusive results that support these claims – in contrast, the “race difference in graduation rates is no larger at the most selective institutions,” and blacks have been shown to benefit from the increased admission to selective universities (Holzer and Neumark, 2000). A study by Cortes (2010) on the Texas Top 10% Plan claims that the banning of Affirmative Action actually increases college dropout rates for minorities and finds that the mismatch hypothesis is inaccurate.

Because quantifying the economic benefits of Affirmative Action is exceedingly complicated, comparing the total costs and benefits of the policy becomes exceptionally difficult for policy-makers. Holzer and Neumark (2000) note that university admissions policies are not necessarily economically efficient to begin with, which further complicates matters since researchers do not have a definitive point of efficiency to which they can compare the results of Affirmative Action.

Administrative costs and externalities must also be factored into the models, when economists have not yet even managed to create a viable model for the effects of Affirmative Action policies. For example, minority students in medical school are less likely to reach as high a level of expertise as non-minorities, but they are more likely to treat minority patients, generating a positive externality (Holzer and Neumark, 2000). Another point made in the debate on Affirmative Action is that diversity may improve the educational quality of a university.

Many educators believe that diversity in colleges is inherently beneficial – students can learn from other students whose experiences and backgrounds give them a whole different set of views and capabilities. Several studies have actually correlated increased diversity in student bodies with improvements in issues such as racial prejudice and bias, although results vary depending on study design, extent and type of diversity, and the issue of interest (Bowman, 2010).

Even so, other researchers are likely to reject such evidence since variables such as attitudes, inter-racial relations, and even school quality (as a result of increased diversity) are difficult to define and accurately quantify (Holzer and Neumark, 2000). Research has often demonstrated very unclear results, usually only weakly suggesting a few conclusions while also providing sometimes conflicting conclusions; one study on the effects of diverse student bodies found that there was no effect on post-college earnings, an increase in satisfaction with college experiences, and a decrease in community service (Hinrichs, 2011).

Interestingly, a recent study in college admissions based on merit, race, and legacy suggests that the removal of race-preferential treatment may actually decrease the ability of the student body since colleges may be inclined to increase legacy-based admissions due to the current economic climate (Li and Weisman, 2011). However, they do also propose that there is a possibility that colleges would need to eliminate all preferences barring merit in order to produce the most-able student body.

Overall, it is generally agreed that more accurate methods for measuring school quality and the quality of school inputs are necessary if more conclusive results on education differentials’ effects on unobserved skills, attitudes, and racial income inequality are to be found. While it is without a doubt that Affirmative Action increases admission and employment rates for minorities, there is much speculation as to whether it is the most effective policy. Researchers are not confident yet of how different variables interact to affect income, employment rates, and other indicators of success.

As a result, one will often find seemingly conflicting data as exemplified by Card and Krueger’s (1992) findings that “5-20% of the post 1960 black gains were due to improved school quality” while Smith and Welch (1989) claimed that 20-25% of black gains were a result of improved school quantity, which they asserted should be the focus of educational policies. Moreover, it is well known that employers often discriminate based on race, whether purposefully or unconsciously, and that this significantly impacts labor market outcomes.

Affirmative Action can only do so much to address employment discrimination – in some models, the issue of negative racial stereotypes can be exacerbated by the application of such policies (Holzer and Neumark, 2000). In addition, some suggest targeting education inequalities in primary and secondary education as opposed to implementing race-preferential treatment in post-secondary education as a more efficient and equitable policy, although efforts such as NCLB have only slightly improved primary and secondary education inequalities.

The primary and secondary education quality in the United States is in dire need of improvement already; high school graduation rates have stagnated, and school quality is falling behind when compared to the educational systems of other developed countries. There also exist other complicated variables that need to be addressed in order to close the income gaps between minorities and non-minorities such as the inheritance of learning abilities/behavior, ghetto culture, and the underclass (Jencks, 1993). As one can expect, research concerning controversial issues often suffers from researcher bias.

Economic research typically entails numerous variables and methods in order to reach conclusions, and more often than not, results are varied and ambiguous, especially in this particular branch concerning Affirmative Action. It is a simple matter to selectively exclude certain results in order to make it appear as if a research study conclusively supports or rejects Affirmative Action as a beneficial policy, should one wish to do so. Literature searches can quickly turn up very obviously biased articles with weak evidence and unreasonable claims.

Furthermore, past research has indicated that the types of models used in studies can have a significant impact on the results, further obfuscating the conclusions on the effectiveness of the policies. In fact, as of present, research on the policies has resulted in mostly ambiguous conclusions, although it is of my opinion that studies in general very slightly lean toward suggesting that Affirmative Action is beneficial as a whole – research studies that conclusively reject Affirmative Action as a viable policy are few and far between, and it is even difficult to find studies that demonstrate significant negative effects.

In order to obtain more accurate data, researchers would optimally be able to create experimental studies with control and treatment groups, but this is very unlikely to occur due to the unethical properties of such studies. Clearly, it has become even more imperative that researchers improve models on the efficiency of Affirmative Action policies in order to obtain more reliable data to demonstrate with greater confidence the effects of the policy. Of course, these topics only cover the economic justifications for Affirmative Action, which is clearly also a matter of social justice.

There is an endless cycle of philosophy-based debates on the policy – should we as a society aim for equity or efficiency? If we are willing to sacrifice some efficiency for equity, how much is optimal? There is also the question of whether society has a responsibility to “[remedy] the present effects of past discrimination,” which begins another entire debate about the responsibility of people today for wrongs committed by ancestors (Jones Jr. , 1985).

Some also believe that Affirmative Action devalues the achievements of minorities since credit may be given to race-preferential treatment instead of to the individuals who accomplish those feats; this can lead to further racial prejudice and bias, possibly encouraging the continuation of racial discrimination in job employment. There are also suggestions that perhaps policies ought to focus on helping the part of the minority population with low socioeconomic status so as to avoid situations in which wealthy black students may be given preferential treatment over more qualified white students living below the poverty line.

The debate over Affirmative Action for women is also just as controversial, for women also suffer from income inequality, but they still receive the same advantages that their male siblings receive. Therefore, one can argue that women are not put at a disadvantage early on in life and that they should not require preferential treatment in admissions or employment. In fact, women who benefit from Affirmative Action are much less likely than racial minorities to be lower-qualified and less-skilled, suggesting that implementing a preferential treatment policy may be inequitable in this case.

Even more abstract of an argument is the claim that men and women will never reach perfect equality since they inherently desire different careers and hold differing aspirations for lifetime achievements. As can be seen, there is literally a myriad of issues that factor into the debate on Affirmative Action. The field of research concerning the topic is beset by the typical problems plaguing education and economics research – education quality and educational inputs to schools are difficult to measure, as are the effects on income, employment rates, job characteristics, etc. The lack of experimental data lends no help.

The effects of nationally implemented legislation are difficult to track and quantify because of differences over time and across states (Altonji and Blank, 1999). Compiling data at a national level is also vastly time-consuming and challenging. Though neither side has conclusive evidence that supports their argument, studies that reveal tentative conclusions on the effects of Affirmative Action policies are emerging, and models are slowly approaching real-world utility. As research continues, hopefully the accumulation of data and models will allow researchers to uncover the true effects of Affirmative Action.

References Altonji, Joseph G. and Rebecca M. Blank. 1999. “Race and Gender in the Labor Market. ” In Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by Orley Ashenfelter and David E. Card, 3143- 3259. San Diego: Elsevier B. V. Bowman, Nicholas A. 2010. “College Diversity Experiences and Cognitive Development: A Meta Analysis. ” Review of Educational Research 80(1):4-33. Card, David and Alan B. Krueger. 1992. “School quality and black-white relative earnings: a direct assessment. ” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:151-200. Cortes, Kalena E. 2010. “Do Bans on Affirmative Action Hurt Minority Students?

Evidence from the Texas Top 10% Plan. ” Economics of Education Review 29(6):1110-1124. Dong, Li and Dennis L. Weisman. “Why Preferences in College Admissions May Yield a More- Able Student Body. ” Economics of Education Review 30(4):724-728. Hinrichs, Peter. 2011. “The Effects of Attending a Diverse College. ” Economics of Education Review 30(2):332-241. Holzer, Harry and David Neumark. 2000. “Assessing Affirmative Action,” Journal of Economic Literature 38:483-568. Jencks, C. 1993. Rethinking Social Policy: Race, Poverty, and the Underclass. New York: HarperPerennial. Jones Jr. , James E. 1985. The Genesis and Present Status of Affirmative Action in Employment: Economic, Legal, and Political Realities. ” Iowa Law Review 70:901-923. Loury, Linda D. and David Garman. 1995. “College Selectivity and Earnings. ” Journal of Labor Economics 13:289-208. Murray, Charles. 1994. “Affirmative Racism,” In Debating Affirmative Action: Race, Gender, Ethnicity, and the Politics of Inclusion, edited by Nicolaus Mills. 191-208. New York: Delta. Steele, Shelby. 1990. The Content of Our Character. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Smith, James P. and Finish Welch. 1989. “Black Economic Progress after Myrdal. ” Journal of Economic Literature 27:519-564.

Read more

Debate on Board Exams

Good morning, one and all! Today’s debate is quite interesting, as we are the victims, rather the part of the society who sees it very closely than the rest. Now, frankly speaking, within each one of us, somewhere or the other we feel, very strongly feel , that board exams are a curse or rather some dangerous, ferocious animals. Truly the very spirit of examination aims at something noble, but unfortunately the implementation process is very unrealistic.

The present examination systems, as I said are very unrealistic, and moreover focus on the core subject of ‘Writing based on Memory’; there isn’t any scope for a child to enhance his/her creativity, there is always an obstruction on the out-of-box thinking. The child along with his parents suffer from acute tension, anxiety and fear during the period of exams, that lead to a very different mental status of a child, and is a symbol that the child is stressed out.

It is not possible, to judge a student’s capacity in a mere 3 hour exam, How can it be possible that a 3 hour exam will foretell a student’s future? And that, this so called board exam be the only parameter to judge a child’s ability. It is really insane to say that, I feel. And moreover, its pure gambling at times, like it depends on the question, and the child’s preparations that coincide to give a better outcome. Sometimes it does and sometimes not. Mentioning draw backs of the exams will lead me to write a novel full of reasons.

Present education system encourages cramming, unnecessary expenditure on help books and also encourages private tuition which has resulted in mushrooming of a large number of tuition shops in every city and even small towns by inexperienced tutors, with a lure to make huge turnovers… Einstein once said and I quote “Every animal has their own talent, but if we judge a fish with its ability to climb tree, It lands to be a failure, always” This is what, board exam does, It tries to judge the memory power, and the power to reproduce the answers on the exam paper, It is a mechanical approach to test a human’s knowledge and not a holistic way.

Now, I would like to ask you, what basically is exam!? Some may say, it’s an art to reproduce things on the exam paper, and yes truly it is! But what is the process involved? Do we give importance to that!? No, some of us might have cheated, used unfair means in the exam, and would come out bravely and speak ‘See I cheated and was undetected” we take credit for this, and here, the basic aim of board exams comes down breaking ! This symbolizes, and I conclude that board exams, or any Exam that focuses on memory, never helps the child in a long run.

Read more

Janae Gaskins Specific Purpose

Janae Gaskins Specific Purpose: The purpose of my presentation is to convince the audience that school uniform shouldn’t be a requirement in high school. Type of Persuasive Speech: Speech to convince I. Introduction 9 pts A. Attention-Ask Question: How many of people wore school uniform in high school? B. Relevance : That school uniform shouldn’t be mandatory in high school. This the age where we know what’s appropriate or not so why take this privilege away from these teenages. C. Purpose/Thesis statement : To refute the claim that high school students shouldn’t have to wear school uniform. D.

Preview of how you will arrange your arguments and rebuttals in the body. (Arguments should answer the question “why” or “how” in response to your purpose, and be stated in parallel form. ) (6 points) The two arguments I will present are: a. Expenses/Variety b. Takes freedom away(Diversity) The solution: c. Signing a contract I. Body To begin lets start with my first argument A. Expenses /Variety 1. They are Expensive. A. Opposition: People think that uniforms are more affordable than normal clothing therefore they prefer to buy uniform than normal clothing B.

Rebuttal: A School shirt costs more than the average shirt a teen wears outside of school 2. Not big variety to choose from a. Opposition to argument i. subordinate idea (support example, statistic, fact, quote, etc) b. Rebuttal (response) to that opposition i. subordinate idea (support example, statistic, fact, quote, etc) transition B. State the Argument (from preview) 1. subordinate idea (supporting example, statistic, fact, quote, etc. ) a. Opposition to argument i. subordinate idea (support example, statistic, fact, quote, etc) b.

Rebuttal (response) to that opposition i. subordinate idea (support example, statistic, fact, quote, etc) transition C. State the Argument/Solution (from preview) 1. subordinate idea (supporting example, statistic, fact, quote, etc. ) a. Opposition to argument/solution i. subordinate idea (support example, statistic, fact, quote, etc) b. Rebuttal (response) to that opposition i. subordinate idea (support example, statistic, fact, quote, etc) II. Conclusion 6 pts A.

Summary of arguments & restatement of thesis B. Visualizing the future and/or call to action or acceptance C. Memorable thought/closing statement or “clincher” Sources Cited Here you will give the full MLA-form citation for ONLY those sources you plan to orally cite (quote/paraphrase) in your speech. (You don’t orally cite in MLA format! )3 sources, cited correctly = 3 pts 1. (at least 3 citations) 2. (all sources, including on-line sources, MUST have an author; anonymous will not receive any points) 3. (must use a combination of sources: . gov; . edu; . org; . com; books, periodicals, media; etc)

Read more

A Debate Pertaining to Illegal Immigrant Children in Public Schools

Roxie Vasquez ENG 102-2270 03/25/06 Research Paper A Debate Pertaining to Illegal Immigrant Children in Public Schools “The terms “illegal immigrant” and “illegal alien” are commonly used phrases that refer to the illegality of the action of migration without legal authorization” (wikipedia). Whether or not illegal immigrant children should be educated at the elementary, middle school, and high school levels in the U. S. , is a fiercely debated topic these days. Many debates are taking place all over the U. S. ertaining to whether or not illegal immigrant children are entitled to a free public education. One major debate taking place here in Arizona is that Governor Napolitano and “its controlled Legislature are locked in a stalemate over the teaching of the English language and how much to pay for it” (nytimes). Furthermore, illegal immigrant children should be given the chance to be educated in the U. S. and should not be banned from public schools because of their parent’s actions. Illegal immigration is a crime and sneaking into the country is in violation of the immigration law.

For many illegal immigrant children, it is a tragedy to be raised here in the U. S. as an American child, to later learn that all their life-long goals and dreams they worked so hard for, aren’t realistic because of their illegal status. The illegal status of these children becomes very deceiving to them because as a young child they have no idea that they are illegal immigrants. It is even more devastating for that child (when the possibility arrives) that later in life that child might have to return to that “unknown foreign country” they were born in.

Also, the American people who live in areas consumed by large amounts of immigrants are concerned about their school budget and the quality of education their child receives. To begin, one opposing argument against illegal immigrant children attending public schools is that it is widely believed that America cannot financially afford to educate the world’s children. Immigrant children attending public schools accounts for the dramatic increases in school enrollment, and failure to consider the capacity may have very real consequences for future public education in the U. S…

Programs created specifically to serve students whose second language is English accounts for much of the extra costs and it is reported from Census that immigrant children accounts for such a large percentage of the school-age population. “An estimated 400,000 illegal immigrant children enter the U. S. each year and educating those children costs several states more than four billion dollars annually” (ap/online). Here in the state of Arizona, Governor Napolitano has “proposed spending $45 million a year to expand the English-language instruction in Arizona’s public schools” (nytimes).

Secondly, a disagreement pertaining to illegal immigrant children attending public schools is that public schools in the U. S. are open to all children, in spite of their status and by law; it is mandatory that all children attend school. Also, the law states that each and every child, despite their legal status, is required to attend school from the age of six years to 16 years of age. The only necessary information to give in order to attend a public school is proof of residency in that district the child wishes to attend, a birth certificate, and vaccination records.

In addition to laws, “Proposition 200 requires Arizonan’s to provide proof of citizenship when registering to vote and apply for public benefits” (azcentral). Because of this law, a numerous amount of Americans are appalled that an illegal immigrant child can attend free public schools without showing any proof of citizenship. In 1982, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled five to four, that undocumented immigrant children are entitled to a free public education. Also, it is common knowledge that “the action of INS has no effect on rules governing school enrollment” (heraldnews).

In addition, each year, thousands of women flee from their country to enter the U. S. and give birth, knowing very much that their child will automatically have U. S. citizenship. Because of this, illegal immigrant children are not to blame for their status. It is not the child’s fault that their parent brings them illegally into this country because a child has no knowledge of illegal immigration or of immigration laws. Too, most children believed to be illegal immigrants are actually U. S. -born American citizens, born to an illegal parent.

It is a fact that “22 percent of all American children under the age of six have immigrant parents” (ap/online). Also, all children, regardless of their legal status have “full rights to a free public education” (weeklyreadercorp. ). Besides, all illegal immigrant children deserve a chance to change their situations and paths in life because “illegal immigrant children are a future part of society and are worth the same investment as an American born child” (softcom. net). Almost all of the several million illegal children that are here will be life long Americans and are likely to be productive adults if they receive support now.

As these illegal immigrant children are raised as an American born child, they will grow up knowing nothing else but the American born child’s way of life. Plus, some stress that money spent on educating immigrants, both legal and illegal, will pay off in future tax revenues as they will earn higher wages. “At this point, Americans are under the false assumption that illegal immigrant children are a distant and separate population that exist apart from the rest of American society” (losangelestimes) and they are wrong: immigrant children in public schools total close to half the percentage of citizen children.

Besides, it is reported that one in every five student has an immigrant parent. Moreover, “under Title 8 Section 1325 of the U. S. Code, “Improper Entry by Alien,” any citizen of any country other than the U. S. who: enters or attempts to enter the U. S. at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers; or eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers; or attempts to enter or obtain entry to the U. S. by willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact; has committed a crime” (wikipedia).

Hundreds of thousands of law-breaking illegal immigrants marched in America’s streets demanding that their right to live, work, and attend free public schools in the U. S. illegally, be respected. Even though America is a nation built upon immigrants, an illegal immigrant should not get a free ride towards citizenship just because they have lived and worked and had children here for years. The U. S. Congress is preparing to reward those who have broken our laws with the most precious treasure, the opportunity to become U.

S. citizens. Thus, some lawmakers have pushed for the prevention of illegal immigrant children being educated even at the youngest grade levels. As it stands now, an illegal immigrant child does not qualify for tuition benefits, but some states have passed laws allowing illegal children residency tuition benefits. Plus, the thousands of children from families of illegals who crowd school classrooms, challenges the claim that illegal workers contribute more than they consume.

It reportedly costs the state of Arizona “$750 million to educate the children of illegal immigrants” (azcentral). What’s more, the “Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that illegal immigrants cost each Arizonan almost $700” (ap/online) a year; a hidden tax that subsidizes illegal aliens and the employees who hire them. Furthermore, if illegal immigrant children are denied the right to a free education, they could end up being illiterate criminals who tap into social services and prison systems.

The cost of incarcerating illegal immigrants in Arizona’s prisons and jails amounts to about “80 million dollars a year; not including the cost of the crime that led to their incarceration. It is far better to have these children in school rather than to have them roaming crime-ridden neighborhoods day and night” (findarticles. com). Over the past several weeks, the debate over immigration overhaul has reached a boiling point, with hundreds of thousands taking to the streets to protest tighter controls on border security.

As an effect of the debate to whether or not illegal immigrants have a right to attend public schools, a majority of the illegal immigrant students have recently walked out of school to protest immigration laws. Many illegal students said they were “marching in opposition to a bill sponsored by Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis. ), that passed the House in Dec. ; the bill would give police more power to enforce immigration laws” (chicagotribune). Although it is not an issue for legislature yet, many illegal immigrant students cannot register for college because they do not have a social security number.

In all, if the world wasn’t fighting over free public education for everyone, then the world’s children would continue attending class and would be safe in school and off the streets. In conclusion, some Republicans have portrayed illegal immigrants as “invaders, criminals, and as burdens to society” (nytimes). Each year the Border Patrol arrest more than a million illegal aliens who flagrantly violate our nation’s laws by unlawfully crossing U. S. borders, often with the aide and help of fraudulent documents.

All in all, illegal immigrants do not contribute more than they cost because the millions in prison and on welfare aren’t contributing a dime to our economy and the ones who are working are often paid in cash without tax deductions. America has a way of bringing us in, welcoming us and allowing us to become a part of the whole. What’s more, illegal immigrants migrate for a better future, education and rights. Thus, the U. S. has taken on many races, religions, and nationalities and has made them one nation; America has always been a nation built upon immigrants.

Read more

The Canidate

In the 1972 movie The Candidate Crocker Jarmin is the current Senator for the United States and he seems to be unbeatable. Marvin Lukas has an idea to get Bill (William) McKay to run against Jarmin in the next race though Mckay was not thought out to be able to beat him. At first McKay […]

Read more
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Close

Sometimes it is hard to do all the work on your own

Let us help you get a good grade on your paper. Get professional help and free up your time for more important courses. Let us handle your;

  • Dissertations and Thesis
  • Essays
  • All Assignments

  • Research papers
  • Terms Papers
  • Online Classes
Live ChatWhatsApp