Industrial Revolution

At the end of the eighteenth century Cambridge was suffering a significative diminuish of the population. We can notice this by looking at the statistics provided. Meanwhile in 1674 the population exceeded 9000, by 1728 Cambridge’s population was under 8000. There were many reasons that could explain this sudden fall in population. One of them was the problem of overcrowding, and the repercussions that overcrowding causes.

Possible consequences of this factor could have been: poor hygenical conditions (lack of clean water for everyone, or excessive amounts of sewage which were hard to get rid of), lack of employment places for everyone, and also very high prices on the property market. This latter problem is strictly related with the expansion issue in Cambridge, which we will explore further on. Another factor which contributed to the fall in population towards the beginning of 1700, was the attraction that cities in the north exercised: this was the period of time in which the Industrial Revolution was fluorishing.

In cities such as Manchester or Leeds ( typical northern cities), there was great possibility for employment, in the newly born industries. We will now analyze in more detail the expansion issue in Cambridge. The city of Cambridge was expanding at a very fast rate, but the space available for settlement was running short. The need for expansion claimed by the University, restricted the residential areas to delimiting and unpleasent territories. Cambridge was surrounded by land liable to flood, which was the main factor that stopped the centre of town and the residential areas from expanding.

Cambridge was also surrounded by open fields, which seemed to be the only possible area in which the town could expand. These open fields, and areas surrounding the town, were mainly owned by the rich. This left the poor with the worst areas, both for settlement and agricolture. This unfair situation was overcome with the aid of the Enclosure acts, which were put in practice in 1802. This movement entitled every land owner to a fair amount of land. For this goal to be made possible, the available land had to be divided into small strips which could be equally shared between everyone.

By 1811 with the Enclosure award, the land surrounding Cambridge had finally been completely redistributed. Now that everyone had the same amount of land, the profit coming from the land would have been fairly regular, and there wouldn’t be so much (disnivel) between the rich owners and the poor owners. The arrival of the Enclosure award had in a way slowed down the the fast rate at which the population was diminuishing.

* The city of Cambridge had been various Ecclesiastical Parishes spread around throughout the town. Generally each area had its own Parish. During the century going from 1801 to 1901 we notice a fast rise in the population of certain Parishes, and especially the Parish of St. Andrew The Less, which was allocated in the Barnwell area (1 mile away from the city centre). The Enclosure Award in 1811, generally incremented the population of every Parish. The population gradually grew in certain Parishes, and although St. Andrew The Less had always seemed to grow at a faster rate than everother Parish, it wasn’t only until 1845 and the following years that its population enourmously grew to reach a final peak of 27860 people.

We will analyze further the reasons of such importance of the Railway, including an explanation of the ubication of this new medium of transport. For now we will only mention the where the people that populated the Parish came from. They were mainly traders, that had previously been using as a medium of trade the river and moved to the Barnwell area to make use of this new revolutionary transport which could have benefitted their business, and students and labourers from other towns that decided to move to Cambridge.

The railway was faster and therefore a better value for money. As we notice from our statistics and our graph, St. Andrew The Less wasn’t the only Parish in which we encountered a rise in population. Other Parishes that were situated near the river side, encountered a substantial rise in population. Not as dramatic as the one in the Parish of St. Andrew The Less, but significantly larger than the ones in Parishes ubicated in other parts of the town. An example could be the Parish of St. Andrew The Great.

The world’s population is unevenly spread across the land surface. The explanation for the uneven distribution lies in a mixture of physical and human factors as well as the historical development of the area. Factors having a positive impact are likely to encourage a high population density whereas those having a negative impact are likely to deter population leading to sparsely populated areas. Within any one country there are also variations. The UK is one such country. The densely populated conurbations and south east of England contrast sharply with the sparsely populated uplands in the north and west of the UK.

Before the industrial revolution in the UK was quite even, although the more fertile agricultural areas such as East Anglia were able to support much higher densities of population than the cold, wet uplands which were sparsely populated. This pattern can still be seen today. The north of the UK is very sparsely populated with the west coast of Scotland having 0- 10 people/ per sq km and a thin line around the east coast having 11- 150 people/ sq km. This is mainly due to their unsuitability for agriculture and their remoteness.

Read this

The land is too steep for farm machinery, the soils are often thin and rocky and there are few lines of communication. The economic potential is low, i. e. there are few opportunities for farming and industry. Occupations are most likely confined to extensive hill sheep farming, forestry, tourism, and quarrying and water companies. However there is an exception to this trend. The valley between the lowlands of Scotland and the beginning of the English mountains has a very high population density of over 500 people per/ sq km.

This is because the area has a positive relief of lowlands and gently undulating terrain with the soils being fertile and easily worked e. g. loams and alluvium. The vegetation is easy to clear and it has valuable grasslands. The valley has well drained soils with adequate water supply for domestic, industrial and agricultural uses. There is also the presence of coal in the area accessible to the outside world and for trade. This presence of coal led to mass rural to urban migration during the industrial revolution giving it a high population density.

The area also has good infrastructure with good export trade and wealthy markets due to the two ports on both the east and west coasts of the area. The east port makes trade to Europe easy and the west Ireland and beyond. The north part of England is fairly sparsely populated with a population density of 0-10 people/ per sq km in the upland areas of the region and 11-50 in the lower areas. This is again due to the unsuitability for agriculture and their remoteness. The land is too steep for farm machinery; the soils are too thin and rocky with a poor infrastructure.

However as with Scotland there is an exception on the east coast and on the west. These two areas are the old industrial core regions of England. The high population densities are a result of the coal and iron ore resource for base of heavy industry which developed during the industrial revolution. This was aided by port access. The focus on technology and enterprise led to continued prosperity. The north east is the most dynamic of the old northern cores, attracting foreign investment and service growth.

East Anglia and East Midlands, as part of lowland Britain, have comparatively fertile loam soils and moderate rainfall with sunny summers. These areas are favoured for agricultural prosperity and as market centres as a result they have a population density of 11-150 people/ sq km. East Anglia is the fastest growth area in the UK aided by the electrification of rail line for computer growth and science park developments. The East Midlands and West Midlands established engineering and automobile industrial areas are also being revived by high technology and service growth.

In south England the area around London has the highest population density with over 150 people/ sq km and Greater London having 6. 3 million people living in the area. The greatest initial resource was London’s location on the Thames estuary, facing the continent. The UK’s incorporation into the EU and the completion of the Channel Tunnel remain significant factors in its growth. London has exerted strong long term influence as the capital and centre for administration and finance.

The area is of national and international importance, setting of cumulative causation and multiplier effect. It is the hub of a national route network. Its expanding population provides prosperous market, helping towards making it the greatest entrepreneurial centre in the UK. It has benefited from a shift in economy from heavy industry to light, service industry, including banking and insurance, especially since the mid- 1930s. the focus is now high technology industry and further service growth. Prosperity has spread especially since the 1960s.

People’s desires and higher core costs led to decentralisation of population and economic activity into the more spacious rural areas, particularly along the M4 and M3 growth corridors into East Anglia. The south west has a sparse population density of 11- 150 people/ sq km. However this is set to change. The south west was part of the more remote upland fringe until recently. Now with lower cost, rural setting and developing motorway and commuter train links, it attracts both retirement and working households, service and high technology growth, as well as tourists.

A Response to Davenport’s Review of American Gothic After reading an except from The Geography of the Imagination, it is clear that Wood, the creator of the world-recognized American Gothic, his included many subtle references to the way our country was changed by the Industrial Revolution in his painting. Davenport begins his enlightenment by informing us that almost everything in this painting is a symbol, whether or not it was even intended to be one.

He starts off with the house pictured in the background of the painting, telling us how it was a “ready-made” house that would be dropped off in pieces and simply put together by ossibly only two men. The geometry and simplicity of the house are the characteristics that have guided him to this conclusion. He later mentions both Sears ; Roebuck as well as JC Penney, which are both commonly known as companies who took advantage of and popularized mass produced items.

Another aspect of this house that Davenport introduces to his audience is the glass windowpanes. Previously a luxury item, the fact that this common farmhouse now has a glass plane is an example of how the Industrial Revolution made certain less attainable items from the previous century, such as glass, as common as the spectacles on the armer’s face. Moving on to the characters portrayed, Wood has included many more references to mass production of new ideas such as buttonholes, clothing that came “ready-to- sew’ including: fabric, patterns, and thread.

The farmer’s overalls are also a depiction of a new fabric, denim, that was popularized for its economy at this time. Even their positions are reminiscent of the Brownie Box Camera and the farmer’s stance with his pitchfork which references that of Egyptian warfare. The implication of a cotton mill, dye works, and a roller press is a complicated ass of production and assembly lines that Davenport shows us is hidden behind something that appears so common to us: a curtain.

A quick look into the buttons seen throughout the painting gives us a tour of the world, pulling into the railroad and ocean-crossing boats that made these simple circles important. Overall, Davenport tells his readers that he is not certain of Wood’s intent, but regardless of the nature of the piece, he has left us many decipherable clues as to how our culture evolved during the Industrial Revolution. American Gothic as it Relates to the Industrial Revolution By rebeccachristensen92

The Industrial Revolution and Its Impact on Our Environment Posted by admin In Environment I Comments Off The Industrial Revolution began in Britain In the 1700’s, and spread to the rest of the world, beginning with the United States. The use of machinery and factories led to mass production, which in turn led to the development of numerous environmental hazards. The effects on the environment would only be seen clearly years later. The use of factories and mass production has led to a depletion of certain natural esources, leaving the environment permanently damaged.

One example of this depletion is deforestation, which is the clearing of forest trees for use in production. When the trees are cleared, the wildlife in the forest also becomes uprooted. The lack of trees is only compounded by the problem of carbon emissions. Whereas forests would help emit oxygen and refresh the levels of healthy gases in the air, factories are emitting poisonous emissions and ellmlnatlng the source of oxygen. The pollution that has resulted from factories Involves not only airborne emissions but land and water pollution as well.

The primary issue resulting from pollution and carbon emissions is that of global warming. As the temperature rises, the glaciers are melting and oceans are rising. More animal species are becoming endangered or extinct as a result of global warming. @The upside of the Industrial Revolution has certainly been the mass production of food for the world population. The population has grown by leaps and bounds due to the availability of food, yet at the same time the mass production of man-made and chemically altered food has also contributed to worldwide obesity and health problems.

Obesity may also be linked to the edentary lifestyle made possible by the use of factory-made home appliances which have made life easier for homemakers (I. e. washing machines, dishwashers) and recreational appliances (namely televisions). While the Industrial Revolution was the cause of posltlve change for the Industrial world, there Is no question that It has wreaked havoc on the environment. The depletion of natural resources, the carbon emissions, pollution and human health problems that have resulted directly from the Industrial Revolution’s accomplishments have only been disastrous for the world environment.

The Industrial Revolution of the nineteenth century led to the growth of Manchester into the industrial center of England. Although Manchester held an abundance of manufacturing power, the effects of this growth were not all positive and many issues faced the people living in urban environments. Healthy lifestyles the social and economic liberties of the people were being sacrificed for the sake of industrial growth and though some recognized and worked to fix these problems, others ignored these issues for personal gain.

Though this time was prosperous for certain individuals, the majority of lower classes faced a number of problems. In a comparison between maps of Manchester in 1750 and 1850 made in document 1, we see that the size of the city grew exponentially during the industrial revolution. Robert Southey, and English Romantic poet, commented on the condition of the city after visiting Manchester in 1807, “A place more destitute than Manchester is not easy to conceive. In size and population it is the second city in the kingdom.

Imagine this multitude crowded together in narrow streets, the houses all built of brick and blackened with smoke” (Doc. 2). Southey continues by describing the monotonous work and “the everlasting din of machinery” being the control of the city. As an English Romantic poet, Robert Southey could have been slightly biased, but still fairly reliable, due to the fact that he wouldn’t have fabricated what he saw completely, but as a poet he could have exaggerated the details of the situation to reflect them more dramatically.

In Report on the Sanitary Conditions of the Laboring Population of Great Britain, public health reformer Edwin Chadwick concisely reports, “Diseases caused or aggravated by atmospheric impurities produced by decomposing animal and vegetable substances, by damp and filth, and close and overcrowded dwellings, prevail among the laboring classes” (Doc. 6). Here, the conditions of the city are directly described as being detrimental to the health of its citizens.

As well as being harmful to their physical health, Chadwick describes its effect on their mental health and social practices, “The exposed population is less susceptible to moral influences, and the effects of education are more temporary than with a healthy population. ” This reveals not only the physical issues facing the people, but the way they have been changed morally.

As a medical reformer, Edwin Chadwick is unbiased based on the fact that he would likely be truthfully reporting the facts of the situation, thus making his report reliable. Reflecting the statements of the sanitary issues and deteriorating health made by Chadwick, a table published by Thomas Wakley in his British medical journal, The Lancet, shows the average age at death for people in different professions and living conditions.

Based on the table, the age of death for citizens in any of the listed professions is lower if they reside in industrial districts. It also displays that people working as laborers or artisans, more common jobs in crowded, industrialized towns, died much earlier (The average death age for laborers in Manchester being 17, while the age for professional workers was 38). Lastly, the ages for citizens of Manchester, of any profession, were lower than those of all other cities, including the other industrialized district shown (Doc. ). This document displays the extreme conditions faced by common industrial workers, reflecting the dangers they faced in the briefness of their lifep. As another medical reformer, Wakley was unlikely to have forged this information as it was for permanent record and education of the situation, therefore making this information unbiased. Despite the advancements in technology and industry during the time, common citizens were forced to live lives reminiscent of the squalor faced in medieval times.

Observations on the Conditions of the Working Class During the Industrial Revolution The British Industrial Revolution of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries brought about a much needed change in the economic structure of the country. The old fashioned, agricultural based economy that Britain had assumed for centuries had become obsolete, and in the spirit of mercantilism and neighborly competition with the French, the English made the drastic change to a manufacturing based economy (Owen, p. 50). This transformation allowed for the emergence of large, manufacturing based cities, an abundance of English manufactured goods, and made Britain, overall, a very wealthy nation. These byproducts of the Industrial Revolution allowed Britain to make great economic strides, but those that put in the hours at the factories that made such a revolution possible gained almost nothing for their treacherous work. The working class of the Industrial Revolution lived hard, laborious lives.

The majority of their time was spent in the factories, which were very often unsanitary, overcrowded, and hazardous, and when they were able to leave the factory and spend time at home, they were met with equally horrid conditions. Although these people and their work were undoubtedly one of the largest factors towards the successfulness of the Industrial Revolution, they themselves suffered greatly, and reaped nearly no benefits for their work. The overall quality of their lives was incredibly poor. Every arena of their lives, from working conditions and home life, to nutrition and cleanliness, was effected by overwhelming poverty.

The urban environment that was thought to be a way out of poverty became a mechanism in which poverty was able to flourish. The life of a working class family during the Industrial Revolution was very much dictated by the factory in which they worked. Employees would spend nearly all day in these horrid environments; most would start their day around five o’clock in the morning, and with the exception of two short breaks for meals, would remain in the factory until eight o’clock at night or later (Kay, p. 155). The factories were dingy, brightly lit buildings that housed far too many people at a time.

They were consumed with dust and filaments of cotton, and contaminated the surrounding areas with smoke. They were were filled with heat and filth, and contained large, dangerous machines that were often operated by children (Aikin, p. 148). Seven and eight year old children were often sent by their parents to work in the factories, and while there they were treated as adults. Robert Owen noted that the manner in which the young employees were dealt with was responsible for an uneducated and emotionally unstable generation of children. He referred to the children as “weak in bodily and mental faculties. ” (Owen, p. 50-1).

The young employees were indeed as horribly unfortunate as Owen described, but upon realizing the conditions they were working in, one can easily see why. The machines in which the children operated were massive and intimidating apparatuses. Cotton mills used spinning machines that were able to hold thousands of spindles at a time, and moved rapidly and forcefully (Aikin, p. 148). Adolescent employees were required to work unreasonably long hours with these machines, for few cared how truly ill-suited the work was for children. The home life of working class families was equally as horrible as their occupations.

James Kay wrote in his essay on “The Moral and Physical Condition of the Working Classes in Manchester” that these families lived in “ill-furnished, uncleanly, often ill-ventilated, perhaps damp” homes that were consumed in “absolute filth. ” (Kay, p. 156). These dwellings were lumped together in communities, only perpetuating uncleanliness and disease, and were representative of the mindsets and attitudes of the people living in them. Kay noted that entire families would often sleep in a single bed and use “a heap of filthy straw and covering of old sacking” as bedding. He observed that the “houses of the poor . . are too generally built back to back, having therefore only one outlet, no yard, no privy, and no receptacle for refuse. ” (Kay, p. 156-7). Essentially, what Kay observed about the working class of Manchester was the overwhelming level of poverty that consumed it. The people that lived in these types of dwellings were incredibly poor, and had no way of relieving themselves from the crushing poverty all around them.

The lives of the working class peoples were reduced to that of animals; they were practically owned by their employers, who never gave them the freedom to better their lives. These people were not nherently ignorant or sub-human, their living conditions were direct products of cruel treatment and outright disregard for them as human beings. Through processes such as workplace advancement, education, or even cleaner living arrangements, the working class would have had a much more plentiful and human-like existence, but they were never given the opportunity to do so. This phenomenon of belittlement was not restricted to the living arrangements; it perpetuated into every area of people’s lives. The typical diet consisted of one true meal a day, which was neither healthy nor substantial.

Breakfast usually consisted of a simple cup of tea that was “most always of a bad, and sometimes of a deleterious quality” (Kay, p. 155). Dinner was the only meal of any true substance, and even it only consisted of boiled potatoes and bacon with melted lard and butter (Kay, p. 155). People with this type of diet were understandably malnourished, and with the combination of poor living and working conditions, they very seldom were in good health. Children often felt the brute force of such an extreme poverty more so than adults, and were “ill-fed, dirty, ill-clothed, exposed to cold and neglect. So much so in fact, that over fifty percent of children living in these conditions died before the age of five (Kay, p. 157).

Crushing poverty often affects people on an emotional level, and this was very much the case during the Industrial Revolution. Frederick Engels compared the mindset of the workers to slaves, by asserting that the only difference between the two is that the old-fashioned slave was openly recognized as a slave, while the urban factory worker was disguised as a free man (Engels, p. 63). Monotonous labor and a life similar to that of a slave drained the emotions of the working class. Urban life created stone cold and despair ridden replicas of once proud men, loving wives, and innocent children. Factory workers participated in “habits generally destructive to their own comforts, [and] of the well-being of those around them” out of pure necessity, but perhaps without full knowledge of the consequences (Owen, p. 151).

Kay compares the toil of the people to King Sisyphus, suggesting that the difficult labor that the factory workers frequently performed was just as in vain as Sisyphus’ endless struggle with his boulder (Kay, p. 155). The tasks required of the poor seemed just as endless to them as it did for Sisyphus, for neither could see an end in sight. The areas in which these people lived became places of crime, caused by the emotional distress of poverty, and were “inhabited by a turbulent population” (Kay, p. 157).

The people became slothful and benevolent, hateful towards outsiders and immigrants from Ireland, and allowed the unpleasantness around them consume them (Kay, p. 154,7). The working class of the Industrial Revolution lived in absolutely horrid conditions. They lived in poverty and filth, they spent their “superfluous gains on debauchery,” and were treated by the upper classes as if they were animals (Kay, p. 155). They lived short lives filled with work, disease and sorrow, with no way out except for death.

The consequence of 2nd moving ridge

In order to cognize the consequence of 2nd moving ridge on the life’s of that clip we need to cognize what their life’s consisted of. It started with the construct of civilisation in 2000bc. Equally shortly as world discovered that they can turn their ain nutrient, and they don’t have to alter topographic points in hunt of resources. They figured out the natural resources needed to make agribusiness. Hence they started with the agricultural society. Where ab initio everyone was husbandman, but so easy alteration in their professions started. Peoples who had faith in God, claimed that they can speak to god and that the God wanted them to interpret his bid to common people, therefore they became priests. As the farms flourished in one country and in other due to natural catastrophe agribusiness failed. Hence others started occupying the well worse countries. In order to protect their resources, some physically fit people were appointed as soldiers. And some of them, who somehow lost their lands, started making uneven occupations of the society. Therefore, in this manner, profession got segregated by dramatis personae. As the society grew, the powerful became more powerful and weaker became more suppressed and increased in figure. Hierarchy in people got function in society edifice. This changed the architecture of the society bit by bit but drastically. Plan of Temple composites started germinating from one threshold to figure of thresholds. One for lower dramatis personae n upper dramatis personae, one for male monarch and common people, and one for priests n male monarchs. And the profession of all the groups of people was determined by what people used to believe of them. In this manner, those who were responsible for planing edifice and infinites became responsible for insistent signifiers throughout the timeline. In this manner, other working topographic points, common assemblage infinites, populating infinites got their signifiers due to this civilization.

This society system continued to be in laterality boulder clay a technological revolution, the industrial revolution began in Britain and within a few decennaries spread to Western Europe and the United States. The period of clip covered by the industrial revolution is approximately between 1760 and 1830. This revolution marked the passage traveling from manus production methods to machines, new chemical and Fe production processes, improved efficiency of H2O power, the addition usage of steam power and the development of machine tools.

Majorly all the little graduated table manual production Stationss were converted into big industries with machines working with steam power and assembly line system doing the production procedure much more efficient and faster.

Important technological development occurred in fabric industry, Fe industry, steam engines, machine tools, chemicals, cement production, paper machine, glass devising, agribusiness, mining etc. We will discourse developments which affected the architecture of the clip straight.

In Fe devising industry, the major alteration was replacing of wood and other bio fuels with coal. Abraham Darby made great work stoppages utilizing coke to fuel his blast furnaces at coalbrookdale in 1709. However, the coke hog Fe he made was used largely for the production on dramatis personae Fe goods. He made the production cheaper n faster but coke hog Fe was barely used for bring forthing saloon Fe. But his boy Abraham Darby 2 built Equus caballus hay and kettle furnaces. Since dramatis personae Fe was going cheaper and more plentiful, it began being a structural stuff following the edifice of the invention Fe p in 1778.

In 1824, Joseph Aspdin, patented a chemical procedure for doing Portland cement which was an of import promotion in the edifice engineering. A new method of bring forthing glass was developed in Europe during the early 19^Thursdaycentury. In 1832, this engineering was used to do big sizes of glass sheets.

With inexpensive and faster production of Fe, the big build infinites like industries became larger in size, now the roof ps could be big and lighter and of class much faster to build. Large undertakings like Bridgess were made possible. With the easier production of cement one can switch to much more strong building stuff, this stuff was one measure in front of calcium hydroxide and brick masonry. With the development of big glass sheets the gaps of edifices changed. Spaces like places, close fold infinites, needed Windowss for sunshine and natural position and at the same clip taking attention of air current and rain. Technological promotions which came into drama at the clip of 2nd industrial revolution like roads, Bridgess, canals, railroads affected the architecture of that clip drastically. Ships were constructed of Fe, which made the travel faster and more people could go. In present society of agricultural civilization, distances between people was big hence there was no exchange of cognition and civilization. But every bit shortly as this revolution happened, due to promotions like ship edifice, roads and railroad paths distances were made smaller and knowledge exchange became much easier. In this manner, the engineerings like metallurgy, cement, glass, beforehand agribusiness techniques found their manner in agricultural society’s worldwide. With the approaching industries people who were of the lower dramatis personae and given less importance found their manner to these industries which provided shelter, nutrient and employment to all of them. This made an instability in agricultural society and hence clash developed between both the thought.

But in some manner, this 2nd moving ridge affected the society adversely, as the increase of employment ; figure of labors came deluging over in hunt of employment. Due to this big figure of people the degree of life style of these people took the set back. They were already from lower category, big in figure ; fewer resources to utilize made the lives of these people miserable. In hostile working conditions, populating infinites became heavy. These rose a large inquiry on the wellness of these people, people used to populate so close to each other that diseases used to distribute like fire. All this affected the architecture but non in a thoughtful manner, big shaded countries were made to shelter their labors. Community lavatories, bathrooms followed them.

Due to this altering life style and altering economic system, bit by bit, a in-between category emerge in industrial metropoliss, largely towards the terminal of the nineteenth century. Until so, there had been merely two major categories in society: wealthy and privilege 1s, and low-income common mans born in the working categories. However new urban industries bit by bit required more of what we call today “white collar” occupations, such as concern people, tradesmans, bank clerks, insurance agents, merchandisers, comptrollers, directors, physicians, attorneies, and instructors. In-between category were those who prided themselves on taking duty for themselves and their households. They viewed professional success as the consequence of a person’s energy, doggedness, and difficult work. And due to this category, lodging architecture took a new bend. Affluent 1s had Villas and large person houses, whereas working people used to populate in bunchs, 100s of people used to populate together. This new set of people couldn’t afford single Villas but were non willing to populate in hostile conditions, where working category used to populate. Hence apartment’s construct got its individuality, where single floors were owned by single household. These lead to-hygienic and comfy infinites to populate.

In these undermentioned ways the 2nd moving ridge showed its feeling on the architecture of that clip:

India was strictly a hub of different agricultural societies with different believes, different rites, different infinites but same hierarchy. But in 19^Thursdaycentury, when Britons arrived and started trade in India, so the First World War happened. India was flooded with industrial revolution based civilization. This civilization was of fast production, assembly line, big industries with tonss of Equus caballus power in the signifier of new coal engines. Transportation, roads, railroads were introduced in India. This brought the new thoughts of edifice in India, which in bend once more affected agricultural society. After independency, the 3rd moving ridge besides found its manner to India and surprisingly spreaded in India quicker than in other parts of universe. And hence, the present India makes a really apathetic combination of agricultural, industrial, information based society.