Realism and Liberalism Comparison

Realism is an approach to the international relations that is founded on four fundamental conventions, such as political groupism, egoism, international anarchy and power politics. This theory assumes that power and control are the primary outcomes if the political processes both on the foreign and internal area of activity.

Liberalism is considered to be a political approach, which is generally founded on the demand to advance, develop and preserve a person. The institution of liberalism is designed on three fundamental and interdependent conventions: “rejects the power politics as the only possible outcome of international relations; accentuates mutual benefits and international cooperation and implements international organizations and nongovernmental actors for shaping state preferences and policy choices” (Shiraev 78).

Key actors in world politics

According to the theory of realism, the key actors in the worldwide area of activity are the states that are interested in their own safety and security, enact in an inquiry of their interstate concerns and fight for control and dominance. Every state actor has to be reviewed as political objects that are conducting their specific concerns defined in terms of power. Moreover, states are able to control other actors.

While realists view states as the only vital key actors, “liberals see the world where there is a variety of non-state actors (such as multinational corporations, intergovernmental organizations, and governmental organizations), share the world stage with countries” (Richardson 17).

The role of international institutions

The proponents of realism claim that the international institutions and various civil groupings are considered to have close to none liberated authority (Rose 151). Moreover, the states are often innately combative and preoccupied with their security; the realists believe that the enlargement of the country area is restrained solely by the conflicting sides.

Liberalists assume that international institutions hold a decisive position in the partnership between states. With the right amount and activity of the international institutions, and expanding interconnection (involving transactions in economic and cultural areas) counties are granted with a possibility to diminish competition and disagreements. Moreover, the liberalists also debate over the international diplomacy and its possible application as a quite efficient method of getting countries to collaborate with each other in an honest manner and reinforce nonviolent and pacifist resolutions to various disputes. Liberalists suppose that with the appropriate international institutions and diplomacy, countries are able to collaborate in order to increase prosperity and reduce conflicts.

States’ priorities

In the theory of realism, the states apply the analytical approach towards decision making by the means of accessing and forcing thorough and definite information. The state is absolute and directed by an internal importance delineated in terms of power. The only restraint of the realistic international system is an absence of government; as a result, this system has no international power and states remain with their own instruments and techniques to establish their own safety, as it is the main priority if the state.

. According to liberalism, interconnection consists of three primary elements (Howard 42). Countries tend to collaborate in diverse methods, through economic, financial, and cultural approaches; the fundamental target of the state-to-state cooperation is not likely to lean towards the security, and armed military organizations are not usually employed. “Liberals see a further parallel between individuals and sovereign states. Although the character of states may differ, all states are accorded certain ‘natural’ rights, such as the generalized right to non-intervention in their domestic affairs” (Dunne 191).

World War I have both liberal and realist explanations in these particular areas. The controversy of key actors in world politics, for example, could be illustrated by the increasing German power: after the consolidation of Germany in 1871, disturbance in the equity of influence in that particular part of the world had occurred. As a result, this disruption was more probable to cause a war to outbreak. Moreover, Germany in support of the realism theory had been expanding economically and endured a resolute alteration of the power. Furthermore, Germany was alarmed because of the expanding authority of Russia and predicted eventual inequalities. The states’ priorities of Germany had illustrated the internal and external intrusive and immensely aggressive politics, which was the reason for the country to start a war.

On the other hand, there are several liberal examples in the World War I (Doyle Ways of War and Peace 31). For instance, Kaiser Wilhelm II tried to implement the liberal states’ priorities and the roles of international institutions during the war. However, as a result, in contrast to Bismarck, he had proven himself to be a liberal bumbler. One specific branch of liberal approach, which is called liberal institutionalism, had been implemented directly after the World War I, when the twenty-eighth President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson had established the groundwork for the League of Nations; thus confirming the liberal role of the international institutions.

As a result, the three articles of peace were conducted: “the constitution of the countries had to safeguard the essential freedoms of their citizens; the concept of Pacific Union and alliance between liberal states; and the obligation of the Pacific Union and its members to treat civilians and visitors from other countries with respect and dignity, this has henceforth been known as the cosmopolitan law” (Doyle Kant, 227).

The Statecraft simulated world

The Statecraft simulated world is represented by six disparate countries, where each country has its own supplies, resources, political direction, economy and the stage of advancement. In order to evaluate the possible performance of each country, we have to grade, classify and establish the most applicable factors, such as the available resources, the governmental system and political approach, the durability and the protection of other countries in the Statecraft simulated world, and the distribution of political forces within the framework of the existing world.

After evaluating every aspect mentioned above in a spectrum of every country, determining which country follows liberal and which country follows realistic approaches appears to be quite accessible. In the given simulated world, the countries that tend to follow the violent approach and are the representatives of a realistic state are Mordor and JAP-N. Both countries are militaristic and industrial; thus, orienting their states’ priority.

Both countries are absolute and directed by an internal importance delineated in terms of power. Moreover, they have a strong support of the other countries in the simulated world. These countries could be compared to the USSR during the Cold War with the USA, as they are currently stocking the military power and exposing the competition with other states.

On the contrary, the countries that are pursuing the liberal approach are Rordudordu and Jupiter. It could be explained by the fact that both countries are scientifically developed; as a result, they tend to enhance the level of education and further scientific advancement rather than engaging in war.

Works Cited

Doyle, Michael. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12.3 (1983): 205-235. Print.

Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. New York, New York: Norton & Company, 1997. Print.

Dunne, Tim. “Liberalism.” The Globalization of World Politics. An Introduction to International Relations. Ed. Baylis, John, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. 185-203. Print.

Howard, Michael. War and the Liberal Conscience, London, United Kingdom: Hurst Publishers, 2008. Print.

Richardson, James. “Contending Liberalisms: Past and Present.” European Journal of International Relations 3.1 (1997): 15-33. Print.

Rose, Gideon. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51.1 (1998): 144–172. Print.

Shiraev, Eric. International Relations. New York, New York: Oxford University Presses, 2014. Print.

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with MyhomeworkGeeks
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Business Studies
Thank you very much for a good job done and a quick turn around time.
Customer 452615, March 31st, 2021
Human Resources Management (HRM)
excellent, great job
Customer 452773, June 19th, 2023
Business and administrative studies
Perfect
Customer 452773, February 23rd, 2023
Business and administrative studies
great job as always
Customer 452773, February 26th, 2023
FIN571
excellent work
Customer 452773, March 1st, 2024
Human Resources Management (HRM)
excellent job
Customer 452773, July 17th, 2023
Business and administrative studies
excellent paper
Customer 452773, March 3rd, 2023
Business and administrative studies
Thank you
Customer 452773, March 19th, 2023
Business and administrative studies
Excellent job
Customer 452773, March 17th, 2023
Nursing
I just need some minor alterations. Thanks.
Customer 452547, February 10th, 2021
Business and administrative studies
excellent job
Customer 452773, March 12th, 2023
BUSINESSADMINECO535
excellent work
Customer 452773, October 6th, 2023
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Close

Sometimes it is hard to do all the work on your own

Let us help you get a good grade on your paper. Get professional help and free up your time for more important courses. Let us handle your;

  • Dissertations and Thesis
  • Essays
  • All Assignments

  • Research papers
  • Terms Papers
  • Online Classes
Live ChatWhatsApp