Social Networking

Hearing the names of Dixie D’Amelio and Kendall Jenner in the same sentence may be a bit odd, but fans have called Dixie out for some pretty risky behavior recently. Before we jump into it, be sure to hit that like button so we know who Dixie’s real friends are.

Who is Dixie D’Amelio?

Dixie D’Amelio is an incredibly popular TikTok star who found massive success after joining the Hype House group of creators in late 2019. Dixie joined TikTok after her sister had already started to become famous on the app, with Dixie finding over 20 million followers within the first few months of joining the app. She owes her success to her sister in some ways, but Dixie has been working diligently to carve her path on TikTok, rather than live in the shadow of her sister. Since joining the app, she has spread her success to other platforms as well, most using Instagram and Twitter to keep in touch with her fans. According to a few online resources, she is the 17th most-followed creator on TikTok. More recently, Dixie has been working alongside a handful of YouTube creators to expand her reach even further. She plans to keep pursuing a career in the entertainment industry and shows no signs of slowing down.

In her early life, she grew up alongside her sister and her parents in Norwalk, CT. In high school, she worked very hard in athletics and played lacrosse as well as ran track. During this time Dixie had already started work on her Instagram profile and was becoming reasonably popular, though her shift to TikTok is what truly launched her career. Her parents Heidi and Marc have been very supportive of both Dixie and Charli and they hope the two can find what they are looking for on the platform. Their parents have appeared in several interviews recently and are always showing up to cheer their daughters on and make sure they are satisfied with the direction their life is going. They also helped Dixie and her sister sign with the talent agency UTA in January of this year.

When Dixie joined TikTok, her sister was already well on her way to becoming one of the app’s quickest growing stars – a trend that continues to this day. Dixie was able to jump on board just in time to find her success and she is doing very well for herself today, commonly collaborating with many of the same creators as Charli. She has been featured in events alongside her sister and Addison Rae – another wildly popular TikTok creator.

Dixie’s Rise In Popularity

Dixie has been working to build a social media following for quite some time. Though, her younger sister, Charli, is the one that introduced her to TikTok. Charli had been creating videos on TikTok for several months before Dixie began to take notice of the app. She doesn’t seem to have been incredibly interested in the app at first, but after seeing the success her sister found on the platform, she began to post videos as well. The two have appeared in videos together quite often, and much of Dixie’s rise to success can be attributed to Charli’s popularity on TikTok. Though, this doesn’t take away from the massive amount of work and effort that Dixie put in. She has worked very hard over the past year to grow her online viewership and seems to be growing very quickly. She has made friends across the country and is always collaborating with other creators in an attempt to share followers.

Just a few years ago, it wouldn’t be incredibly uncommon to see fellow creators competing with one another to see who can reach the top of the charts more quickly. Though, it seems that there has been a major cultural shift regarding internet followers. Many artists, such as Charli and Dixie, seem to be collaborating with people much more often than creators have done in the past. It seems as though online creators have finally started to realize that we are much stronger as a collective than as individuals – and this is true for social media fans as well. If two creators have massive followings but cater to entirely different audiences, it makes perfect sense that, if the two collaborate, they could virtually double their viewership. Oddly, it took creators and fans such a long time to realize this, but we are incredibly happy to see that Dixie and Charli are setting a new standard for what it means to be a collaborator. The sheer volume of content these girls put out is astounding, but to also see them working on content with other creators is amazing.

We can all learn a lot from Dixie’s success, especially since she and Charli are constantly collaborating and sharing fans and viewers. These girls seem to have their heads on straight and are working hard to continue being two of TikTok’s biggest rising stars.

Controversy Between Dixie and the Jenner Family

Most major TikTok stars tend to keep their heads above water and don’t let themselves get too involved with drama and conflict. Though, it seems like Dixie D’Amelio may have unknowingly invited controversy into her life and potentially carved a wedge between herself and the Jenner family. Dixie has been active on Instagram for many years and is constantly posting new photos and videos of herself enjoying her day to day life. Though, more recently, she has been involved in a fair amount of controversy with her fans, who seem to insist that she has been copying Kendall Jenner.

Kendall Jenner is a 24-year-old who has been in the modeling and social media business for many years. She first found fame when she began appearing in the television show Keeping Up with the Kardashians. When she was just 14-years-old, her modeling career officially began, leading her to become the worldwide phenomenon we know and love today. Kendall is currently expected to be the world’s top-paid model, making several million dollars per year from her modeling career. Kendall has been incredibly active on social media and is easily one of the world’s most popular social media influencers. The number of companies she has worked with is unreal and she continually works to top her previous posts, bringing in new fans and new funds with every upload.

She is most commonly regarded for her involvement in the makeup business and the various brands she endorses. This has led to many of her photos showing herself wearing a new brand of makeup or a new type of specialty clothing. This is where things between Kendall and Dixie get a bit interesting. It’s no secret that Kendall has been posting controversial makeup images to Instagram and other social media websites for many years. It’s not uncommon to see some of her fans attempt to mimic her style, but some of Dixie’s fans seem to believe that Dixie is deliberately copying Kendall as a way to cash in off of her success. We don’t have enough evidence to claim this ourselves, but fans seem to be convinced that Dixie has been stealing her style and appearance from Kendall for many months. While these are some very serious allegations, we can understand where fans and viewers are coming from.

This is backed by several photos that Dixie has posted on various websites in which she appears to be wearing the exact clothing as Kendall, wearing the same makeup design as Kendall, or even mimicking her expressions or hairstyle. This has been very off-putting for some fans who can’t seem to decide whether the fashion choices have been intentional or if Dixie is just heavily influenced by Kendall.

Dixie’s Copycat Tactics

Several images have been posted online by fans who insist that they have undeniable proof that Dixie has been copying Kendall. A few of these photos have been proven to be fakes, but many of them are very real and we can’t deny the similarities between the two.

https://twitter.com/artbyselena/status/1244787937704841217

A Twitter user recently spoke out against both Dixie and Addison Rae, claiming that the two had deliberately copied a post that was made by Kendall Jenner and Gigi Hadid. In the image, we can see Dixie and Addison staring at each other in front of a beach. It’s a beautiful photo of the two and shows off each of their natural beauties and their love for one another. On its own, this is all around a very heartwarming photo of two friends hanging out and having a good time. Though, the context of this photo suddenly changes when you realize that Kendall Jenner and Gigi Hadid posted a nearly-identical photo previously. The two may not have been on a beach, but they were positioned in a very similar way, with dark-haired Kendall on the left and light-haired Gigi on the right. In Dixie’s photo, dark-haired Dixie was on the left and Addison was on the right. The two were also similarly staring at each other and even had the same black and white filter applied to the image after it was taken. This seems a bit too similar to be a simple coincidence.

This wouldn’t be that big of an issue if it was a single occurrence, but a Twitter user named Luisa posted several images that show how Dixie and Addison seem to be directly copying Kendall and Gigi. In another image, Dixie and Addison are looking at each other as they approach a beach on a boat. A similar photo was posted by Kendall and Gigi with the two staring out across the ocean water. The next image shows Dixie and Addison sharing a pizza – paired with an image of Kendall and Gigi sharing pizza. Another photo show’s Dixie and Addison hanging out at a sports game together, with a paired photo of Kendall and Gigi hanging out at a sports game together. The list that Luisa posted goes on and on and there are over a dozen similar images between the two. We still cannot say for sure that these images were intentionally created to copy Kendall and Gigi, but the evidence is pretty compelling

The Final Verdict

We are interested to know what you guys think about the Dixie/Addison and Kendall/Gigi conspiracy. Let us know if you feel like it is legitimate, or if these photos are pure coincidences. It’s easy to see both sides of this argument. On one hand, Luisa makes a very good point in showing that the relationship between Dixie and Addison is eerily similar to the relationship between Kendall and Gigi. Though, it can also be said that the two are simply partaking in events and public gatherings that are incredibly common for people of this financial status. We can’t say that there is any one particular photo that shows irrefutable evidence that Dixie has been copying Kendall, but we can understand how many fans may get this impression.

https://www.elitedaily.com/p/dixie-damelio-has-a-surprise-for-you-22934109

At the end of the day, it’s highly likely that all four of these guys have similar friendships to one another. They are each a part of the entertainment and modeling business, so it makes sense that they would go to similar places and take similar photos. Though, we have to mention that Dixie appeared in an interview recently and was asked about her style. More specifically, she was asked who she would consider being her celebrity style icon. Her answer: Kendall Jenner.

Thanks for watching. If you liked this video, be sure to hit that like button and ring the notification bell for more great videos. 

When sat down by a man, let us call him ‘Vincent’ for now, and asked to contemplate an understanding of modern society how does one react? Obviously ‘Vincent’ is looking upon you for a conclusive answer to this, after all, his rather stern look on his wrinkle free, cosmetically moisturised, face, nestled above a ‘Skinny-Fit’ tight black suit worn on his gym harassed body, is expecting an answer. However, just as you begin to start an ‘umm..’ filled explanation of your personal interpretation to the very meaning of modern society he stops you; reaching into his pocket to silence his buzzing iPhone.

“Sorry about that, just had a new friend request on Facebook, you know how it is”. A response that immediately makes you realize that in fact your flawed theory of modern society is not as you first thought, but is rather sitting across the table from you in Starbucks (one of the select with free wi-fi, of course).

Whilst naturally this metaphor is going to be biased in perspective it lays out many of the key features of society noted within the last few, recession deprived years. Major players being incorporated into our everyday life: the need for access to the internet, the surrounding claustrophobia of technology and the nonexistence absence of the likes of ‘Facebook’ from our lives.

Evidently however this is no such element of negativity in our lives, however could it be? We commit to our jobs, our families and our sharing of information – all freely of course. Alternatives are there, the – somewhat handicapped – benefits system, a life alone and a disconnection from the knowledge of what society is doing as of now. The only reason this newly discovered element makes face into our lives is because we welcome it, embrace it for it’s true value for society.

Speaking of values: our friend ‘Vincent’ happens to be a combined banking-marketing-sales extraordinaire, knowledgeable of course on all products, on the money that we all value so dearly and without a doubt the economy. It is therefore an inarguably brilliant idea to approach him for his opinion on social networking, for us na�ve members of society have nothing to lose and all to gain in terms of knowledge on our own day to day living conditions. Now it is our turn to ask the question, but this is no feat for ‘Vincent’ to overcome.

This brilliantly presented metrosexual man has his answer already prepared, after all, he knows. ‘Social media is simply the greatest benefit we have made available to us’ – the first golden nugget of information we learn. Grasping onto each and every word we have little choice but to beg for an expansion on this idea, wishing not to be kept in the dark about his views. ”To people like me”, and I quote, ”the social network is the best marketing tool man could create’ ‘It allows for us to sell you a product at any time, but not just any product, a product tailored to you via all the information you provide daily”.

‘Tailored’ to us? What better a reason could we have than this to enable identification of our lives; after all, modern society moves quickly, saving time in a way alike this is beneficial to all. In no way detrimental?

”Socially society has evolved, much in thanks due to social networking”

”The electricity used in the use of social networking ultimately ends up benefitting the economy through tax and the likes of”

”After all, how else could friend A and friend B communicate with such ease?”

I had to stop him there: ‘Vincent’ was blowing through my boundaries for enlightenment of brilliance for one day. He has a point, we all think the same whilst reading that. Socially we are all so much closer, universal, able to talk so fluently to one another over text, so flawlessly typed. Nowadays overcoming the boundaries of not seeing the other reciprocates emotions are simple, why one just incorporates a ‘:D’ to show joy, or a stigmatic ‘-.-‘. The need for face to face social interaction is less than ever, something we as society naturally embrace, for interaction takes time, and our capitalist motto of ‘time is money’ could never be truer.

You get the point. Social networking’s effect on our lives has been as great as the tone of menace from the strong, metaphorically feminist, business like woman sitting to our right, disgraced at the use of ‘man-kind’ and my creation of a ‘man’ for the wider metaphor rather than a unisex character named ‘Sam’.

Daily we offload information private to us without whole knowledgeable consent, daily we allow for our face to face interactions to be interrupted. These issues themselves are detrimental, but detrimental to modern society? How can something be detrimental to society if it is society?

REVIEW ON MOBILE PRESENCE SERVICES IN SOCIAL NETWORK APPLICATIONS

Abstraction—Today broad scopes of nomadic devices are available. As the use and engineering of nomadic devices additions, societal web applications are going popular. An indispensable constituent of this societal web application is nomadic presence service, which maintains each nomadic user’s presence information. The presence information means the current position, GPS location of nomadic user and besides updates the user’s online friend’s information. As the update occur often, figure of message distributed by presence waiter may take to scalability job.To specify this job, scalable waiter architecture called PresenceCloud is defined.In cosmopolitan nomadic telecommunication system ( UMTS ) , the presence service is performed by IP multimedia nucleus web subsystem ( IMS ) .A weak consistent scheme is used to cut down the presentment traffic. Presentment clip means clip needed to advise the presence information to other users. This paper makes a reappraisal on work outing buddy list hunt job.The consequence shows that PresenceCloud achieves public presentation addition in the hunt cost without compromising hunt satisfaction.

Keywords—social web ; nomadic presence service ; presence information ;

I. Introduction

Mobile computer science is human-computer by which a computing machine is expected to be transported during normal use. This involved nomadic communicating, hardware etc. Chiefly nomadic calculating describes about communicating among client to server, client to other terminal user, waiter to server etc.

Today as the engineering and use of cyberspace additions, societal web application/services ( illustrations are Facebook [ 1 ] , Twitter [ 2 ] , buddycloud [ 3 ] , Google latitude [ 4 ] , foursquare [ 5 ] ) go popular in worldwide. Many communications like confab, online concern, informations sharing etc can be done utilizing societal web application/services. Hence, it is inevitable that societal web services will be the following coevals of nomadic cyberspace application. Mobile presence service is one of the of import component in societal web application. Mobile presence service means maintain up-to day of the month presence information of all nomadic user. Presence information includes location, position, activity etc about the nomadic users. Each nomadic user has a list of friend’s list which we can name as buddy list. On the other manus, we can state that buddy list contains the contact information of the user he/she needs to pass on. Each nomadic user in the societal web application gets information about their on-line friends/buddies via the presence information. The nomadic user’s position is broadcast automatically to the buddy list whenever the user moves from one position to another. So presentment is an of import portion in societal web application. Most presence services use server bunch engineering, to maximise hunt velocity and minimise the presentment clip. The waiter involved in this communicating, keeps up-to day of the month path of all these presence information sing the nomadic user. There are so many issues in nomadic computer science. Some are deficient bandwidth, require careful usage of practical private web, cell phone signals may do wellness jobs, signal jobs during going, more power ingestion during less signal strength etc.

In cosmopolitan nomadic telecommunication system ( UMTS ) , the presence service is performed by IP multimedia nucleus web subsystem ( IMS ) .Here a weak consistent scheme is used to cut down the presentment traffic. Hence presentment clip can be cut downing. Presentment clip means clip needed to advise the presence information to other users.

Instantaneous message provides communicating ( online confab ) between two or more users over cyberspace. Microsoft courier, yahoo courier are some of the illustrations for the instant message. Overview of the available characteristics, maps, architecture, protocols used in these popular populace IM web are described. Besides discuss advantages and disadvantages of these IM webs.

In societal web application an efficient and scalable server-to-server sheathing architecture called PresenceCloud is used to better the efficiency of nomadic presence services for large-scale societal web. A quorum-based server-to-server architecture is used for efficient buddy list seeking. The comparing consequence shows that PresenceCloud achieves public presentation additions without giving hunt satisfaction. Search satisfaction is defined as the clip it takes to seek for the geting user’s buddy list.

II. Different engineerings

This subdivision describes assorted method or engineerings used in different systems. Here, foremost describes about different characteristics and maps supported by three most popular IM systems: AIM, Microsoft MSN and Yahoo! Messenger. Second describes, in cosmopolitan nomadic telecommunication system ( UMTS ) web architecture, to cut down the presentment traffic a decrepit consistent strategy called delayed update can be used. Third describes about chord which provide a scalable peer-to-peer search service for internet application. Finally, an efficient and scalable waiter architecture called PresenceCloud is defined.

In [ 6 ] describes different maps and characteristics of three IM systems such as AIM, Microsoft MSN and Yahoo Messenger. Instant messaging can be specify a public confab etc. In extra some provide file transportation, webcam use, voice confabs session etc. Here the writer comparing three IM systems ( AIM, Microsoft MSN and Yahoo Messenger ) .All of these IM systems uses client-server architecture. Supporting immense figure of user is an of import issue in these IM systems. Two methods are available: 1 is symmetric and other is asymmetric. Each waiter performs indistinguishable maps in symmetric method and in asymmetric method each waiter execute peculiar activity assigned to it like log in, detecting other users, maintain chat room etc.

For normal operation AIM uses client-server architecture and for voice confabs session uses peer-to-peer attack. Therefore two clients communicate straight without utilizing a confab room. For normal and voice confabs YMSG uses client-server architecture. Through centralised voice chat server YMSG voice traffic is routed. One advantage of utilizing this attack is that within the same confab room it can back up multiple users and each user can stipulate their ain voice specification. For normal operation MSN uses client-server architecture and for voice confabs session uses peer-to-peer approach.MSN voice chat session is limited to two individuals. Most of the IM systems have techniques for keeping list of friends. They are called buddy list, allow list and block list. Buddy list contain peoples that a user demand to pass on and supervise their presence. Block list contains peoples that a user demand to barricade communicating with them, it’s besides called black list. Allow list contains people that a user needs to pass on. MSN, AIM and YMSG contains buddy list and block list.MSN and AIM besides contain allow list.

Many web protocols like TCP and IP have used binary representation of informations in byte order. Application bed protocol ( HTTP and SMTP ) have used text-based attack. The advantage of utilizing bye order is that it supports efficient usage of infinite in the web. The advantage of text-based attack is that the representation is closer to human position information and debugging is easier.AIM and YMSG utilizations binary representation for their header.AIM contains two-level binary representation called FLAP and SNAC packages. Fixed length heading and variable length day of the month in FLAP packages. SNAC packages are subtype of FLAP packages that contains fixes length Fieldss followed by a variable information constituent.

Fig.1.AIM FLAP and SNAC package format

YMSG has individual degree construction for fixed Fieldss followed by variable length

Fig.2.YMSG package format

One of the of import job in IM suppliers are user send informations at inordinate rate, inundation caused in the web because of useless traffic.TCP provide some protection mechanism against this through congestion control.AIM has a complex algorithm for solve this, but it has different rate ( rates are based on a clip window ) bounds based on message type. The user will be warned, if the client exceeds the rate and if this continues, the waiter will get down dropping message and will unplug the client. YMSG has a bound of three IM per seconds. Another method to minimise the burden is by acquiring rid of idle clients. Each system in IM maintains a keep-alive pulse message: the connexion may be terminated if the client does non supply pulse message or response to the question. In AIM the client must direct this keep-alive message in every minute to the waiter. YMSG contains two types of pulse petition: a primary and a secondary.MSN has client and waiter pulse message.

In [ 7 ] paper, to cut down the presentment traffic a decrepit consistent scheme is used. In IP multimedia nucleus web subsystem ( IMS ) , the presence waiter is responsible for advising an authorised spectator of the updated presence information. Presence service provides service to entree other user’s presence information such as the user position, activities and so on. In cosmopolitan nomadic telecommunication system ( UMTS ) web architecture, a user with user equipment entree presence service in IMS. When the user provides information to the presence waiter, so user play the function as presentity and the user accesses other user’s information so it act as a spectator. In IMS, control signaling is carried out by call session control map ( CSCF ) .The presence service process is defined by 3^rdcoevals partnership undertaking ( 3GPP )

The presence waiter instantly notifies other users in the contact, when the presence information of a user alterations. If the updates occur more often, so the figure of presentment messages increases. To cut down the presentment traffic a decrepit consistent strategy called delayed update can be used. In delayed update, when the presence waiter receives the updated presence information, the presence waiter starts a delayed timer with a period T. This period is called delayed threshold. Within the period T, if the presence information is updated, so old information is replaced by the new information. When the timer expires, the presence waiter notifies the spectator of the presence information. Therefore, the presentments for the updates in T are saved.

In [ 8 ] mentioned about chord which provide a scalable peer-to-peer search service for internet application. A cardinal job that challenges peer-to-peer application is turn uping the node that store a peculiar information point. This paper presents a solution for this by showing chord. The chord provides one operation: given a key, it maps the cardinal onto a node.In peer-to-peer system, the application is distributed without any cardinal control, where the package running equivalent in functionality at each node. The corresponding node is responsible for hive awaying a value associated with the key. Chord uses hashing to delegate keys to allow chord nodes. Each chord node needs merely a few other nodes routing information. Because the routing tabular array is distributed to other nodes. If N-node presented in a system, so each node maintain information merely approximately O ( log N ) other nodes. The chord maintains its routing information as the nodes articulations and leaves a system.

In [ 9 ] paper, an efficient and scalable waiter architecture called PresenceCloud is defined. PresenceCloud solve the scalability job called buddy list hunt job. Buddy list hunt job can be defined as the scalability job occurs when presence service is overloaded with buddy hunt message. The PresenceCloud can be used to expeditiously question the system for buddy list hunt. In PresenceCloud design, it consists of three constituents: PresenceCloud waiter sheathing, one-hop caching scheme and directed buddy hunt. When the nomadic user get into the PresenceCloud, the user authenticate to the nomadic presence service. Then the nomadic user opens a TCP connexion to one of the presence waiter. The nomadic user sends a petition to the presence waiter for buddy list hunt. PresenceCloud returns the presence information of the brothers. PresenceCloud is based on grid-quorum system ( size is vn?vn. When a presence waiter joins into the PresenceCloud, it gets an Idaho in the grid and obtains its presence waiter list. Presence server node can take one column and one row of entries. This entry is called the presence waiter list.

In the fig: 3, the figure of presence waiter n=9.The PresenceCloud is arranged in grid-quorum with v9?v9 size. The presence waiter node 8 has presence server list { 2,5,7,9 } and 3 has { 1,2,6,9 } .

PresenceCloud uses a hoarding scheme to retroflex presence information of each user to better the efficiency of the searching operation. Each presence server node maintains presence information of the affiliated users. When the neighbour establishes a connexion to presence waiter, the cache is updated. When a presence waiter receives a query/request from the nomadic user, it can react non merely from the lucifers from its ain list, but besides provide lucifers from its caches.

Fig:3 PresenceCloud Server Overlay

The figure of presentment messages increases when the nomadic user often changes its presence information. This buddy list hunt job can be solved by utilizing an algorithm called directed buddy hunt algorithm. This algorithm uses bipartisan sheathing and one-hop caching scheme. This helps PresenceCloud to supply fleet responses for big figure of nomadic user. The algorithm is defined in [ 9 ] .

III. Comparison

In mesh based design, all the presence information at each node is replicated to other nodes. Hence its hunt cost is merely one message. In distributed hash tabular array ( chord based ) , no reproduction ; presence information of a user is merely stored in one presence waiter. Here, each brother must be searched one by one. In PresenceCloud, its hunts buddy list from ain node list and cache list. Besides notifies other users about the new presence information.

Simulation consequence is mentioned in [ 9 ] .This paper shows graphical representation of their consequence. Findingss from that graphical representation are:

( I ) As the reaching rate of nomadic user additions, the figure of presence message is really low in PresenceCloud. Hence PresenceCloud outperforms all other design.

( two ) As the reaching rate of nomadic user additions, the mean seeking messages/user is low in PresenceCloud. That means PresenceCloud requires least message transmittal.

( three ) Average message transmittal of PresenceCloud additions bit by bit with the figure of presence waiter.

( four ) Average message transmittal of PresenceCloud is non impacted by the figure of brothers.

When analysing hunt satisfaction in waiter architecture, the findings are ;

( I ) Buddy seeking latency grows with the figure of presence waiter in PresenceCloud. Here mesh-based design performs better.

( two ) When the figure of brothers additions, buddy hunt latency is really low in mesh-based design. but suffer to a great extent communicating cost.

Decision

From the analysis and survey, it’s found that PresenceCloud achieves low hunt latency & A ; shows better public presentation than others. PresenceCloud solve brother list hunt job. Overall, PresenceCloud support a scalable nomadic presence service in big graduated table societal web services.

Mentions

[ 1 ] Facebook, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.facebook.com.

[ 2 ] Twitter, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.twitter.com

[ 3 ] Buddycloud, hypertext transfer protocol: //buddycloud.com

[ 4 ] Google latitude, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.google.com/imtl/enus/latitude/intro.html

[ 5 ] Foursquare, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.foursquare.com

[ 6 ] R. B. Jennings, E. M. Nahum, D. P. Olshefski, D. Saha, Z.-Y. Shae, and C. Waters, ”A survey of cyberspace blink of an eye messaging and confab protocol, ” IEEE Network, 2006. .

[ 7 ] W.-E. Chen, Y.-B. Lin and R.-H. Liou, ”A weakly consistent strategy for ims presence service, ”IEEE Transactions on Wireless

Communicationss, 2009.

[ 8 ] I. Stoica, R. Morris, D. Karger, M. F. Kaashoek, and H. Balakrishnan, ”Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer search service for cyberspace, ”IEEE/ACM Tran. on Networking, 2003.

[ 9 ] Chi-Jen Wu, Jan-Ming Ho “A Scalable Server Architecture for Mobile Presence Services in Social Network Applications, ” IEEE minutess on nomadic computer science, 2013

Instagram can be a dangerous new form of social networking. Smart phone users now have an option to download an app called Instagram. Although it is the new, trendy thing to do, it can be an issue. The basics of Instagram are to post only pictures. Users can put a small bio about themselves, but it is nothing like the other social networks where users will post all sorts of pointless information. When a picture is posted, users can put a caption for it and the caption is often followed by things called ‘hashtags’.

Examples of these include #pretty, #somuchfun #beach, or whatever it is pertaining to the photo. In the search section, users can search for words or phrases that have been hashtagged. There are choices to “follow” other Instagram users, but the main issue is that of the user doesn’t want to be followed by somebody, they have no choice. On other social networks, there is an option to accept or decline followers, but on Instagram there is not. Instagram is generally used by people between the ages of 14 and 25, which makes it a lot worse that there is no way to keep away potentially dangerous users.

When somebody searches for a hashtag, every use of that hashtag by every Instagram user pops up. There is no need to be following a person to look and “like” their pictures. Although there is an option to set your Instagram profile as private, only a minority of people actually do it. I have and use my Instagram every day. I love it. I think it is great to be able to only post pictures and to only be able to see pictures that others have posted.

My main stream of pictures doesn’t get all crowded up with people posting pointless statuses about their life and annoying political references. I do have negative thoughts about it though. I hate it when strangers like or comment on pictures that I post. I am being followed by people I have never met and no nothing about and I cannot do anything about it. I am sure to only post pictures that don’t show where my location is or put any captions about there I live. I would hate to see some horrendous things happen to users of Instagram because of ignorant mistakes like that.

Social networking has become a well-known to all and all in recent years. People are able to meet and make friends, even if they do not know each other. Moreover, they are able to get updates from their loved ones by using social networking sites. Some people are also discussing different important topics on them. They exchange their ideas as well. However, there are several negative effects of social networking sites on our day to day life. People are becoming socially backward by using social networking sites. They do not like to go out to interact with other people.

Logging into a community, they intermingled with other people online. They have also replaced the actual procedure of social interaction. Before the invention of these sites, people were keen to go out and meet with other people, but now they sit in front of computers to relate with others. Furthermore, people who are shy in public take advantage of using communal sites. Thinking beyond the social network should be hard for them. These sites are not helping them to overcome their shyness. If they tried to interact with people, they might make it.

But because of these sites, they do not even try to do it. Thus social networking sites make people unsocial and socially reluctant. Another effect of community networking is online predators. If someone uploads photos and videos for showing their friends and families, they could be caught by online hunters. Raiders collect photos and videos that are not theirs and misuse them; for example, by creating rumors. These can be displayed for even teenagers and children to see, causing harm. Children and teenagers are becoming addicted watching adult photos and videos.

Those predators also follow what you are doing online. Another problem is social networking sites use internet slang. Thus social networking sites are making people morally unhealthy. Finally, the most important effect is people are losing their valuable time, specially the students and officials. Instead of studying, they are playing on different shared interacting sites. A statistic shows that about 68. 4% undergraduate students spend 11 hours per day by chatting and playing games in social networking sites.

Furthermore, officials use these sites instead of doing their job. Social networking sites are being banned because of the inefficiency of the workers. Another statistic shows that about 43% American service holders are addicted to facebook. Social networking leads numerous adverse impacts on our life. People are becoming hesitant as they do not go outside to meet people. They are losing their precious time by surfing social networking sites and chatting with others. People are becoming morally corrupted as a result of using jargons and watching uncensored photos and videos.