|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Management ReportTeam Roles Identified
|
|
1.0 pts
Completed
Students identified team roles as per the committee management report. These roles include the meeting facilitator, secretary, and polisher.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
1.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Management ReportTeam Meeting Attendance Noted
|
|
1.0 pts
Completed
Team members noted their attendance in team meetings
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
1.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Management ReportTeam members signed management report
|
|
1.0 pts
Completed
Team members signed committee management report.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
1.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness DescriptionBusiness has a name
|
|
1.0 pts
Completed
The business has been given an appropriate and meaningful name.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
1.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness DescriptionBussiness is based on brick and mortar locations
|
|
2.0 pts
Completed
The business described has multiple noted physical locations that will support the business priority project, or has one specific location amongst many that will serve as the foundation for the business priority project.
|
1.0 pts
Partially Complete
Inadequate detail provided as to specific company locations or specific location of a company store that serves as the foundation of the business priority project.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
The company is an online-only store or no detail is provided about specific company locations.
|
|
2.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – Business IndustryIndustry is defined
|
|
1.0 pts
Completed
The business industry is defined and your company’s place within the industry has been appropriately specified.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
1.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – Supply Chain DescriptionDetailed description of upstream supply chain. Supply chain does not need to be owned by the team, but main product supply chain needs to be well defined.
|
|
3.0 pts
Completed
The supply chain supporting the company has been detailed extensively and completely which each link specified and explained.
|
2.0 pts
Partially Complete
The supply chain supporting the company is noted, but detail for product movement is unclear or too broad. One or more obvious links in the supply chain are missing.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
The supply chain for the company is mentioned with no definition or detail.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
3.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – DemographicInformation is efficiently organized in a table format.
|
|
4.0 pts
Completed
Customer demographic table is presented that is easy to read and follow. Customer categories are mentioned, appropriate (i.e. correct and several) demographic criteria are detailed, criteria have appropriate ranges specified, and reasoning/logic or (even better) references supporting demographic makeup are provided. DEMOGRAPHIC AND PSYCHOGRAPHIC criteria may be combined within the same table.
|
2.0 pts
Partially Complete
Customer demographic table is presented that is either not easy to read and follow. (or) Customer categories are not mentioned, inappropriate demographic criteria are detailed, criteria do not have appropriate ranges specified, or reasoning/logic or references supporting demographic makeup are not provided.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Customer demographic table is presented in an unrecognizable format or with incomplete information.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – DemographicCustomer categories are purposefully defined and meaningful to the industry being discussed.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
Customer categories have been developed which have clear importance for the business to serve. The categories are defined and meaningful.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Too few customer categories have been developed to have an impact on the business. Alternatively, all customer categories have not been fully defined or are not all meaningful.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Customer categories are not important for the business to serve. Alternatively, the categories are not defined or meaningful.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – DemographicAn appropriate list of demographics has been defined (all that are applicable).
|
|
4.0 pts
Completed
All applicable demographic criteria have been defined.
|
2.0 pts
Partially Complete
Demographic criteria are appropriate and applicable; however, the list requires more depth and development.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Obvious demographic criteria have been omitted from customer categories.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – DemographicDemographic selection supported by research and statistics.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
Demographic criteria are driven by referenced and cited research and statistics. If direct references cannot be provided, appropriate references help build the logic and reasoning supporting demographic criteria selection
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Demographic criteria are only supported by reason or logic with no outside references or statistics
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Demographic criteria are not all supported or developed.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – PsychographicInformation is efficiently organized in a table format.
|
|
4.0 pts
Completed
Customer psychographic table is presented that is easy to read and follow. Customer categories are mentioned, appropriate (i.e. correct and several) psychographic criteria are detailed, criteria have appropriate ranges specified, and reasoning/logic or (even better) references supporting psychographic makeup are provided. DEMOGRAPHIC AND PSYCHOGRAPHIC criteria may be combined within the same table.
|
2.0 pts
Partially Complete
Customer psychographic table is presented that is either not easy to read and follow. (or) Customer categories are not mentioned, inappropriate psychographic criteria are detailed, criteria do not have appropriate ranges specified, or reasoning/logic or references supporting psychographic makeup are not provided.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Customer psychographic table is presented in an unrecognizable format or with incomplete information.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – PsychographicCustomer categories are purposefully defined and meaningful to the industry being discussed.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
Customer categories have been developed which have clear importance for the business to serve. The categories are defined and meaningful.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Too few customer categories have been developed to have an impact on the business. Alternatively, all customer categories have not been fully defined or are not all meaningful.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Customer categories are not important for the business to serve. Alternatively, the categories are not defined or meaningful.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – PsychographicAn appropriate list of psychographic has been defined (all that are applicable).
|
|
4.0 pts
Completed
All applicable psychographic criteria have been defined.
|
2.0 pts
Partially Complete
Psychographic criteria are appropriate and applicable; however, the list requires more depth and development.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Obvious psychographic criteria have been omitted from customer categories.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – PsychographicPsychographic selection supported by research and statistics.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
Psychographic criteria are driven by referenced and cited research and statistics. If direct references cannot be provided, appropriate references help build the logic and reasoning supporting demographic criteria selection
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Psychographic criteria are only supported by reason or logic with no outside references or statistics
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Psychographic criteria are not all supported or developed.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – Customer ExperienceThe reader percieves sensory details from the story – see, hear, smell, taste, feel.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
The reader is fully immersed within your store and experiences all appropriate senses detailed. Sensory details are provided in a logical flowing manner and contribute to the overall customer experience.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
One appropriate sensory detail is missing from your description. The reader is left to question an aspect of your customer experience.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Sensory details are not fully described. The reader does not have a picture of your store within their mind.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – Customer ExperienceCustomer visit is detailed from arrival to departure.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
The reader has a descriptive customer visit to understand how a store visitor arrives, interacts, and departs from your business location.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Details of how the customer arrives, interacts with store professionals, or departs are missing. More description is needed to fully convey a complete picture of a customer visit.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
There is no clear flow as to what the customer is experiencing when detailing the store visit. Multiple details are missing when it comes to store arrival, interaction, and departure.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Description – Customer ExperienceCustomer’s experience story is relayed in third person. A character has been named and defined.
|
|
2.0 pts
Completed
A customer has been named and defined. The customer is experiencing the scenario presented.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
2.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – OrderAn ordinal list of business priorities is provided.
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
Business priorities are listed and ranked. At least the first two priorities are detailed in how/why these priorities drive your business.
|
4.0 pts
Partially Complete
Business priorities are listed and ranked.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – AlignmentBusiness priorities align with demographic target definitions.
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with your target customer categories’ demographic variables. There is a connection presented between your customer categories, the demographics which support those categories, and the priorities driving your business.
|
6.0 pts
Partially Complete
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with customer demographics.
|
4.0 pts
Incomplete
There is a disconnect between customer demographic variables in supporting your business priorities. A clear connection between how all selected demographic variables support your company’s business priorities is not presented.
|
2.0 pts
Cursory mention
Demographic variables are mentioned, but there is no development or connection to business priorities.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – AlignmentBusiness priorities align with psychographic information.
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with your target customer categories’ psychographic variables. There is a connection presented between your customer categories, the psychographics which support those categories, and the priorities driving your business.
|
6.0 pts
Partially Complete
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with customer psychographics.
|
4.0 pts
Incomplete
There is a disconnect between customer psychographic information supporting your business priorities. A clear connection between how all selected psychographic variables support your company’s business priorities is not presented.
|
2.0 pts
Cursory mention
Psychographic information is mentioned, but there is no development or connection to business priorities.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – AlignmentBusiness priorities align with customer experience.
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with your detailed customer experience. There is a connection presented between your customer experience and the priorities driving your business.
|
6.0 pts
Partially Complete
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with customer experience.
|
4.0 pts
Incomplete
There is a disconnect between how your customer experience details your business priorities. A clear connection between how the customer experience supports your company’s business priorities is not presented.
|
2.0 pts
Cursory mention
The customer experience is presented, but there is no development or connection to business priorities.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – AlignmentThe centralized/decentralized strategic arrangement of purchasing department functions and functions tangential to the purchasing department (transportation, warehousing, etc.) align with business priorities. The description is extensive and complete.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with the strategic arrangement for the centralized/decentralized decisions associated with the purchasing department (category management, negotiations, replenishment) and the tangential functions of transportation and warehousing. There is an extensively developed connection between the purchasing department decisions and the priorities driving your business.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with the strategic arrangement for the centralized/decentralized decisions associated with the purchasing department (category management, negotiations, replenishment) and the tangential functions of transportation and warehousing.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
There is limited detail between how your decisions associated with the purchasing department support your business priorities.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – AlignmentThe centralized/decentralized strategic arrangement of purchasing department functions and functions tangential to the purchasing department (transportation, warehousing, etc.) align with business priorities. The description is clear and specific.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with the strategic arrangement for the centralized/decentralized decisions associated with the purchasing department (category management, negotiations, replenishment) and the tangential functions of transportation and warehousing. There is a clear connection between the purchasing department decisions and the priorities driving your business.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with the strategic arrangement for the centralized/decentralized decisions associated with the purchasing department (category management, negotiations, replenishment) and the tangential functions of transportation and warehousing.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
There is a disconnect between how your decisions associated with the purchasing department support your business priorities.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – AlignmentNew item questions align with business priorities.
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with your selected new item questions. There is a connection presented between your questions and the priorities driving your business.
|
6.0 pts
Partially Complete
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with the new item questions
|
4.0 pts
Incomplete
There is a disconnect between how your new item questions support your business priorities. A clear connection between all the new item questions and your business priorities is not presented.
|
2.0 pts
Cursory mention
New item questions are presented, but there is no development or connection to your business priorities.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – New item:7 questions relevant to new item selection proposed.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
7 questions are posed and detailed in respect to why these questions are relevant to the new item selected.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Fewer than 7 questions are posed and detailed or one or more of the questions are not relevant to the new item selected.
|
1.0 pts
Incomplete
Fewer than 7 questions are provided or the 7 questions are simply listed with no relevant detail offered.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – New item:7 (new item) questions posed are clear and specific
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
7 questions are posed which are clear and specific in their relation to the new item selected.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Fewer than 7 questions are posed or one or more of the questions are not clear or specific to the new item selected.
|
1.0 pts
Incomplete
Fewer than 7 questions are provided or the 7 questions are not clear or specific in relation to the new item selected.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – AlignmentItem elimination principles align with business priorities.
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with your item elimination principles. There is a connection presented between your principles and the priorities driving your business.
|
6.0 pts
Partially Complete
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with the item elimination principles.
|
4.0 pts
Incomplete
There is a disconnect between how your item elimination principles support your business priorities. A clear connection between all the item elimination principles and your business priorities is not presented.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Item elimination principles are presented, but there is no development or connection to your business priorities.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – Item eliminationThe 5 item elimination priorities are relevant to the item being removed
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
Item elimination priorities posed are detailed with respect to why these elimination priorities are relevant to the item being removed.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Fewer than 5 item elimination priorities are posed and detailed or one or more of the item elimination priorities are not relevant to the item being removed.
|
1.0 pts
Incomplete
Fewer than 5 item elimination priorities are provided or the 5 elimination priorities are simply listed with no relevant detail offered.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – Item elimination5 item elimination priorities stated are clear and specific
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
5 item elimination priorities are posed which are clear and specific in their relation to the item being removed.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Fewer than 5 item elimination priorities are posed or one or more of the priorities are not clear or specific to the item being removed.
|
1.0 pts
Incomplete
Fewer than 5 item elimination priorities are provided or the 5 elimination priorities are not clear or specific in relation to the item being removed.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – AlignmentItem elimination strategy (the specific manner in which you will exhaust inventory of an item) aligns with business priorities
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with your item elimination strategy. There is a connection presented between your elimination strategy and the priorities driving your business.
|
6.0 pts
Partially Complete
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with the item elimination strategy
|
4.0 pts
Incomplete
There is a disconnect between how your item elimination strategy supports your business priorities. A clear connection between all the item elimination strategy and your business priorities is not presented.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
Item elimination strategy is presented, but there is no development or connection to your business priorities.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – Item eliminationItem elimination strategy (the specific manner in which you will exhaust inventory of an item) is detailed and complete.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
Item elimination strategy presented is detailed and fully supports your exhaustion of the inventory behind the item being removed.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Item elimination strategy is missing a few key details to support your exhaustion of the inventory behind the item being removed.
|
1.0 pts
Incomplete
Item elimination strategy is not detailed and there is no connection between the strategy and how inventory of your item being removed will be exhausted.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – Item eliminationItem elimination strategy (the specific manner in which you will exhaust inventory of an item) is clear and specific.
|
|
5.0 pts
Completed
Item elimination strategy presented is clear and specific in supporting your exhaustion of the inventory behind the item being removed.
|
3.0 pts
Partially Complete
Item elimination strategy is missing a few points of clarity or is not specific to support your exhaustion of the inventory behind the item being removed.
|
1.0 pts
Incomplete
Item elimination strategy is not clear or specific and there is no connection between the strategy and how inventory of your item being removed will be exhausted.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – New itemThe cost of the new item is detailed in an exhaustive and complete manner
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
The cost of the item is detailed where all aspects of the expenses necessary to offer the product within your store are provided.
|
6.0 pts
Partially Complete
The cost of the item is detailed in many aspects, but one or more expenses are omitted from the analysis.
|
4.0 pts
Incomplete
The cost of the item is detailed while missing obvious component cost prices that should be detailed.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
The cost of the new item is mentioned with no details or input cost analysis.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBusiness Priorities – New itemThe cost of the new item is detailed in a clear and specific manner
|
|
7.0 pts
Completed
The cost of the item is clear where all aspects of the expenses necessary to offer the product within your store are provided.
|
5.0 pts
Partially Complete
The cost of the item is mostly clear and specific in many aspects, but one or more inputs are not clear or necessary.
|
3.0 pts
Incomplete
The cost of the item is developed with several specifics missing.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
The cost of the new item is mentioned with no clear or specific development.
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePricing Analysis – Supply chain stepsEvery step in the supply chain that adds cost to the manufactured cost of goods sold is shown in the pricing analysis.
|
|
7.0 pts
Completed
All steps within the supply chain are shown in the cost of the new item being sold.
|
5.0 pts
Partially Complete
Many steps within the supply chain are shown and detailed, with 1 to 2 obvious omissions.
|
3.0 pts
Incomplete
Some steps within the supply chain are shown, but limited detail is provided and/or many supply chain steps are omitted.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
The supply chain is listed with no cost information or cost information with no development.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePricing Analysis – Financial tableThe team’s report provided a financial table with researched and realistic costs, markups, and margins at each step in the supply chain.
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
A financial table is presented that is easy to read and follow with researched and realistic cost, markups, and margins for each step in the supply chain.
|
6.0 pts
Partially Complete
A financial table is presented with researched and realistic costs, markups, and margins for many steps in the supply chain. The table may suffer from a small lack of clarity.
|
3.0 pts
Incomplete
A financial table is presented with cost information that is not supported or realistic. Additionally, not all costs are developed within the supply chain. The table itself may be unclear.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
There is no distinguishable value derived from the financial table because the table is unclear or has no meaningful cost information.
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePricing Analysis – Priority alignmentThe quality, practices of the manufacturer, and supply chain methodologies regarding the new item chosen is in-line with the company’s priorities.
|
|
9.0 pts
Completed
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with the supply chain behind your new item selected. There is a connection presented between your supply chain strategy and the priorities driving your business.
|
6.0 pts
Partially Complete
Top 1 or 2 business priorities align with the supply chain strategy behind your new item selected.
|
4.0 pts
Incomplete
There is a disconnect between how your supply chain strategy supports your business priorities. A clear connection between the supply chain strategy and your business priorities is not presented.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
Supply chain strategy is presented, but there is no development or connection to your business priorities.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
9.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePricing Analysis – DistributionThe distribution of the new product is identified and detailed as a cost, neutral, or profit activity
|
|
3.0 pts
Completed
The distribution of the new product is identified and detailed as a cost, neutral, or profit activity.
|
1.0 pts
Incomplete
The distribution of the new product is identified as a cost, neutral, or profit activity.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
3.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and OrganizationA detailed executive summary precedes the report
|
|
4.0 pts
Completed
An executive summary is provided that quickly summarizes the purpose, contents, and outcome of the business report. The summary helps to set the stage for the entire report.
|
2.0 pts
Partially Complete
An executive summary is offered, but the summary is missing the purpose or contents or outcome of the report.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
No executive summary is provided.
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and OrganizationProfessional business language is used
|
|
7.0 pts
Completed
Language utilized is professional and appropriate for a business report. There are no contractions or personal editorials within the writing. The writing conveys business professionalism.
|
5.0 pts
Partially Complete
Language utilized is mostly professional. There are minimal instances where professionalism breaksdown within the report.
|
3.0 pts
Incomplete
The lack of professional writing and tone hinders flow and contributes to a lack of reader comprehension.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
Professional business language is lacking.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and OrganizationProper grammar is utilized throughout the report
|
|
7.0 pts
Completed
Grammar utilized is appropriate for the business report. The grammar contributes to overall reader comprehension and helps to provide clarity for the reader.
|
5.0 pts
Partially Complete
Grammar used is mostly accurate with minimal breakdowns in grammar contributing to brief periods of a lack of clarity or comprehension.
|
3.0 pts
Incomplete
Grammar utilization hinders flow and contributes to repeated instances of a lack of clarity.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
Grammar utilized is inappropriate and does not contribute to reader comprehension.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and OrganizationA business situation has been selected and addressed throughout the report
|
|
7.0 pts
Completed
The authors have committed to select a business scenario and continously have that scenario shine throughout the report. The scenario is appropriate and applicable to the business selected.
|
5.0 pts
Partially Complete
The authors have committed to select a business scenario and continously have that scenario shine throughout the report.
|
3.0 pts
Incomplete
The authors detail a business scenario, but lose focus at times throughout the report. The report does not consistently refer to the business scenario.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory mention
There is a limited business scenario developed or the report is specifically written to the professor as a school assignment.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and OrganizationInformation provided is accurate, detailed, and clearly explained
|
|
7.0 pts
Completed
Information provided is accurate and detailed. The detail supports the overall report and all information is appropriately explained.
|
5.0 pts
Partially Complete
The information presented is accurate and mostly detailed. There is an opportunity to explain minimal information to a greater degree.
|
3.0 pts
Incomplete
Information is mostly presented, but not detailed. The informatin is listed with little explanation.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
Infomation offered is either unexplained or inaccurate.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and OrganizationWriting and presented flow contributes to overall reader comprehension
|
|
7.0 pts
Completed
There is a flow within the report that proceeds logically and contributes to reader comprehension. The writing adds to this flow and sentence construction is appropriate and conveys the reader through the report.
|
5.0 pts
Partially Complete
Flow breaksdown at times through the report. This occurs because a logical presentation of ideas is missing or sentence construction does not contribute to reader comprehension.
|
3.0 pts
Incomplete
The writing style utilized does not contribute to reader comprehension or there is not a logical flow of ideas presented.
|
1.0 pts
Cursory attempt
The writing style is inappropriate and flow within the piece is lacking.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
7.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and OrganizationA proper conclusion ends the submission
|
|
4.0 pts
Completed
A conclusion is presented that succinctly reviews the contents of the business report and properly ends the document.
|
2.0 pts
Partially Complete
A conclusion is offerend that attempts to end the report. The conlusion may not properly summarize the report or provides an abrupt ending to the assignment.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
No conclusion is provided.
|
|
4.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Management ReportTeam Deliverables
|
|
2.0 pts
Completed
Team members noted and detailed deliverable delivery dates with initials
|
1.0 pts
Partially Complete
Team members either noted and detailed deliverable delivery dates or wrote their initials next to deliverables.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
2.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 250.0
|
