United Nations

Delegation: France Security Council

The situation concerning Syria.

This delegate of France is deeply disturbed by the situation progressing in France. Revolt and protests have been progressing for over a year and have no clear end in sight. There is a standing death toll has exceeded 70, 000, and every day that the peoples’ needs are not met, this number rises. This is not an issue that will resolve itself. Without the assistance of the international community this delegate has little hope for an improvement in the situation.

On the 19th day of the recent Homos shelling, a tragic event which has claimed the lives of hundreds of trapped civilians, two western Journalist were killed killed; Marie Calvin and Remit Schlock. Marie was an American reporter working for the Sunday Times in London, and Remit a freelance photographer from France. Their satellite phones where tracked and targeted using highly sophisticated equipment. In President Sad’s assault on this city, he is showing no regard for the lives of expatriate Journalists nor his own people.

Syrians own government is killing its civilians. No government whose enemy is its own citizens can continue without problems. This delegate feels that at this point the country of Syria has lost its sovereignty. If President Sad continues these ruthless actions then international action needs to take place in order to end this chaos. First of all, the protection of Journalists needs to be enforced if Syria is to gain back any acceptance. The rights and safety of Journalists should be standardized internationally.

If the killing of western Journalists does not stop then the government of Syria must be forced to allow protection to be given to them by UN peace enforcement officers or some other form of international protection. But this delegate has reached a point where it does not trust protection provided by Syrians own domestic law enforcement. Sad’s action of tearing Syria apart from the inside, appears to be one of the largest factors fueling the ongoing conflict.

In any resolution of a major issue, compromise is key, and the delegate of France feels that he may be speaking for everyone when he says that the well being of president al Sad should not be the highest priority. France and hopefully with the backing of the international community will draft a resolution to assist Syria through there transitional period into prosperity after it has put an end to the conflict. This delegate wishes to listen to the people solve this wishes to see peace.

The United Nations Environment Programme ( UNEP ) matching United Nations environmental programme, back uping developing states in implement environmentally strongHYPERLINK “ hypertext transfer protocol: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_peacebuilding ” policies and patterns. It was start as a consequence of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in June 1972 and has its central offices in Nairobi, Kenya. UNEP has six regional offices and different state offices. UNEP is represent transversally the Earth by six regional offices: in Africa Nairobi, Kenya. Asia and the Pacific in Bangkok, Thailand. Europe in Geneva, Switzerland. Latin America and the Caribbean in Mexico City, Mexico. North America in Washington DC, USA, and West Asia in Manama, Bahrain.

UNEP ‘s planetary and transverse scrotal position is throw back image in its organisational construction, its behavior and its human resources. UNEP staff semen from about 100 states. About tierce of UNEP ‘s about 1,000 staff reside and work in Nairobi ; the most are located around the universe in more than 28 metropoliss in 25 states.

UNEP ‘s planetary foundation is in Nairobi, Kenya. It is peculiar of merely two UN programme headquartered in the underdeveloped universe. Bing base in Africa give UNEP a first-hand considerate of the environmental job expression developing states. UNEP has a caput office in Paris, France, anyplace its Division of Technology, Industry and Economics ( DTIE ) is headquartered. UNEP and DTIE have subdivisions in Geneva, Switzerland, and Osaka in Japan.

UNEP ‘s chief mission is provide leading and promote partnership in helpful for the environment by animating, inform, and enable states and peoples to develop their quality of life without via media that of future coevalss.

UNEP is the nominative authorization of the United Nations system in environmental impact at the planetary and regional degree. Its understanding is to organize the enlargement of environmental policy consensus by maintained the planetary environment under reappraisal and convey lifting issues to the consideration of authoritiess and the international community for action. The bid and aims of UNEP emanate from United Nations General Assembly declaration 2997 ( XXVII ) of 15 December 1972 and subsequent amendment adopted at UNCED in 1992, the Nairobi Declaration on the Role and Mandate of UNEP, adopted at the Nineteenth Session of the UNEP Governing Council, and the Malmo Ministerial Declaration of 31 May 2000.

Its actions cover a big series of issues about the ambiance, Marine and tellurian ecosystems. It has play a of import portion in developing international environmental conventions, promote environmental scientific discipline and information and exemplifying the m those can work in concurrence with policy, working on the development and execution of policy with national authoritiess and regional establishment and working in concurrence with environmental Non-Governmental Organizations ( NGOs ). UNEP has besides been lively in grant and processing environmentally-related development undertakings. UNEP has aided in the development of guidelines and pacts on issues such as the international trade in potentially unsafe chemicals, Tran border air pollution, and taint of international waterways.

The World Meteorological Organization and the UNEP founded the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC ) in 1988. UNEP is besides one of some Implementing Agencies for the Global Environment Facility Major maps are International agreements to better environmental protection, Periodic appraisals and scientifically sound prognosiss to keep declaration devising and international consensus on the chief environmental menaces and response to them, keep for more helpful national and international response to environmental menaces, including policy advice to authoritiess, many-sided organisations and others to beef up environmental protection and integrated environmental considerations into the sustainable development pattern, More successful coordination of environmental affair surrounded by the UN system, better consciousness and installation for environmental direction between authoritiess, the private sector and civil society, Better apprehension of the link between environment and human security, poorness obliteration, and forestalling and extenuating natural catastrophes.

UNEP, s duties are Promoting international cooperation in the field of the environment and urge appropriate policies, Monitoring the significance of the planetary environment and assemblage and circulating environmental information, Catalyzing environmental consciousness and accomplishment to turn to major environmental menaces between authorities, the private sector and civil humanity, Facilitating the coordination of UN actions on affairs concerned with the environment, and guarantee, through aid, affair and engagement, that their behavior take environmental considerations into history,

Developing regional programmes for environmental sustailiability. Helping, upon petition, environment ministries and other environmental governments, in peculiar in developing states and states with economic systems in passage, to explicate and implement environmental policies, Supplying country-level environmental capacity edifice and engineering support, functioning to develop international environmental jurisprudence, and supplying professional advice on the development and usage of environmental constructs and instruments.

The understanding through standards-driven environmental policy in developed states over the past decennaries suggest that the authorization environmental criterions and engineerings acted as a draw on economic growing and costs have been far better than expected, while still rather low-cost given their high incomes. This realisation has induced developed states to look for more capable or at least less valuable agencies of achieve the same degree of environmental security during the usage of economic or market-based instruments.

For developing states and the transitional economic systems of Eastern Europe and the old Soviet Union, the divorce of environmental policy from economic policy and from strivings to accomplish sustainable development is nonmeaningful and potentially black both economically and environmentally. Where criterions of life are intolerably low, where poorness is a major beginning and victim of environmental debasement, where natural resource direction is the engine of growing, where once designed economic systems struggle to reconstitute and retrieve, enforcing restraints on economic activity to protect the environment for its ain interest instead than as an input in sustainable development has really limited entreaty. Under these status, environmental policy can non be divorced from economic policy and development scheme. Furthermore, under conditions of speedy economic growing and huge structural alteration, mandated criterions and engineerings that permit no room for differential answer and alteration to rapidly altering fortunes be together really valuable and hard to implement. Command-and-controls require the generous usage of assets such as capital, authorities income, direction accomplishments, administrative and enforcement capablenesss, the really factors that are in scarce supply in developing and reforming economic systems.

The challenge for developing states and transitional economic systems is to categorise and follow instrument that articulation together environmental and economic policy and that are penurious in their usage of scarce development and direction resources instruments that allow differential response by economic units and adjust flexibly to altering fortunes. The hunt for instruments of environmental direction in developing states and transitional economic systems is a hunt for instruments of sustainable development. Economic instruments meet most of these conditions and are unambiguously suited for the integrating of environmental and economic policy and can be designed to progress sustainable development.

Help Wanted World Politics – POLS*1500 Word Count – 1,562 Abstract: This paper aims to questions the United Nations ability to create and maintain peace within a country. This paper will examine the extent of action that the UN commits when a nation encounters internal conflict. Looking at the Rwanda genocide, the paper concludes that the UN is inefficient at creating and building peace. Help Wanted During the twentieth century the world entered into a new sphere of international relations. New technology which led to military advancements evoked countries to act out wars that were unprecedented in past generations.

When their was conflict between nations, it became easier to cause destruction towards the other nation because of new advanced technology, and therefore the brutality of war was far worse. After World War II, which many call the most horrific war of the century, 51 countries came together and formed the United Nations in 1945. This organization set standards for morality so that the world would not have to experience the same brutality that they had faced during World War II. It encouraged cooperation and peace between countries. Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. former American ambassador once said that,“the primary, the fundamental, the essential purpose of the United Nations is to keep peace. Everything it does which helps prevent World War III is good. Everything which does not further that goal, either directly or indirectly, is at best superfluous. ”1 The United Nations was an organization who’s principle was to create an international center of understanding and cooperation. Although this was a clear goal, this was a difficult task for the UN because it involved so many different states and actors.

The Rwanda Genocide is an example of the United Nations inability to fulfill its goal. In the early 1990’s, the nation of Rwanda faced a ruthless internal conflict between two races, the Tutsis and the Hutus. Although these two races had the same religion, culture, and language, they saw themselves as different because of past colonial influences that had ensued this society for decades. 2 Although mass killing were taking place in Rwanda, the UN did not intervene to the extent that was demanded.

The United Nations’ unclear peacekeeping tactics, lack of resources, and unwillingness to use force during the 1994 Rwanda Genocide led to the murder of over 800, 000 Rwandans and evoked disgrace towards the organization that promised peace. The unfolding events of the Rwanda Conflict had much to do with the hatred that Tutsis and Hutus felt for one another. It was viewed by many as a genocide, but the Security Council of the United Nations had much hesitation accepting that conclusion.

In the Charter of the United Nations, it states in Chapter I, Article 2 that, “ nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state”3. The UN believed that within a nation, the government should control its sedentary conflicts and the organization should not intervene with such matters. However, promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms is the UN’s main goal, and therefore the organization should intervene in internal conflicts if they believe these rights are being denied.

This unclear practice caused the UN to make decisions about intervening in the Rwanda conflict for it depended on the basis opinions of the Security Council instead of decisions based on facts4. Because the definition of genocide could not be construed to an individual conflict, it was up to the Security Council and there underlying goals to come to a decision. As thousands of people were being murdered based on their race, the UN unclear peacekeeping regulations held the organization back from acting. This was also seen when Mr.

Waly Bacre Ndiaye, a Amnesty international representative, reported to the UN recommending “a series of steps to prevent further massacres” but the report seemed to be “largely ignored by the key actors within the United Nations”5. By not taking into consideration the opinions of firsthand witnesses of the genocide, the UN disregarded its duty to protect and build peace within this nation. These irresponsible peacekeeping tactics caused the organization to fail in their peaceful pursuits and ultimately led to the death of thousands. Without taking into onsideration Rwanda’s cultural instability and their need for support, the United Nations was therefore unsuccessful. As the conflict in Rwanda continued to progress to a critical state, the UN did not seem to have the resources needed to neutralize and keep the peace within the country. This has to do with the economic expense of peacekeeping. It is believe that “the projected cost of peacekeeping rose from some US $600 million in 1991 to an estimated US $2. 3 billion for 1993”6. States were unwilling to contribute more to the UN because they had other concerns that were higher in national interest.

The United Nations had to ration the support they gave to each cause and therefore the demanded assistance in a nation could not always be met. When the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) was planning their second phase of their mission to create peace, there was “no estimate of the date of further deployment because the necessary additional resources had not been made available”7. Without the proper materials and supplies available to the United Nations, the organizations power to act was limited because of the lack of resources.

It is believed that, “the predicament of the United Nations is the mismatch of large responsibilities and few powers to fulfill them”8 This problem was seen in Rwanda Genocide. The United Nations had so many responsibilities to the world, and yet, the major actors in this organization did not know how to allocate their assistance. The UN’s lack of resources caused a halt in their ability to neutralize the conflict in Rwanda which allowed the massacres to continue, thus, the organization ultimately failed in its peacekeeping pursuits.

The United Nations inability to secure peace in Rwanda had much to do with the organizations unwillingness to use military force. When discussing the Rwanda Conflict, the Canadian Forces stated that, “in order to prevent or suppress the crime of genocide, the necessary international… military will [should have been] marshaled and mobilized”9. Although the UN does not promote the use of military force, and have many steps of peacekeeping before employing this option, the brutality of the Rwanda Genocide could not have been resolved by means of negotiation.

This was seen through the failure of The Arusha Accord. Although all the parties in Rwanda had signed this peace agreement, the negotiations created bitterness and violence between the two groups of people which escalated the conflict10. During the UN’s decisions about the conflict, there seemed to be a “overriding consideration… to avoid entering into a course of action that might lead to the use of force and unanticipated repercussions”11. The UN was unwilling to send troops into Rwanda because of the unforeseen violence that was taking place.

The outcry for help was tremendous, however, the conflict’s escalating tension and violence caused the organization to weigh its obligation to this cause. Once the United Nations created a plan of action to be implemented in Rwanda, the “size of force was far to small to meet the assigned mandate within the increasingly tense conditions”12. Though the United Nations was contributing to creating peace, it lacked the force that was needed. Lieutenant-General[->0] Dallaire “sent [UN] Headquarters a draft of Rules of Engagement… pecifically allowing the mission to act, and even to use force, in response to crimes against humanity and other abuses”13 Headquarters, however, never responded. The fear of the repercussions and losses due to implementing military force in Rwanda caused the violence to continue. Peace could only be implemented in Rwanda if the United Nations used military forces as power. Karl Maier a German author stated that, “in Rwanda, one person’s God is another person’s Satan”14. The peace needed in the nation would only be achieved by using force and commanding the violence to stop.

The UN’s unwillingness to provide the military forces that were demanded allowed the Rwanda massacres to continue and therefore illustrates the United Nations failure during this conflict. The United Nations failure to bring peace to Rwanda was due to the organizations unclear peacekeeping tactics, lack of resources and unwillingness to use military force. This conflict caused many deaths that could have been avoided if the UN had implemented the proper plans and created clear, logical tactics.

Although the events are tragic, the United Nations “had much to learn, and many adjustments needed to make in applying [peace] in the future”15. The former Secretariat of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, has given public apologizes and leading actors in the Security Council including former American president Bill Clinton, have expressed their regret to act during the Rwanda genocide. The UN has conducted inquiries to try to understand how a conflict of this magnitude could occur without the United Nations having the ability to neutralize the situation. By understanding the causes, the hope is that history will not repeat itself.

The United Nations has taken responsibility for their failure to provide peace within Rwanda. This has led to the organizations credibility to grow in recent years through their work internationally to help build and keep the peace. Although the United Nations did not provide peace in Rwanda, they have had a tremendous affect on the cooperation between different countries. If this international organization can create clear procedures of how to deal with, and when to intervene in internal problems, the United Nations will have more success in their pursuits. Footnotes 1. Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. Quotes,” Think Exist, November 2, 2011, http://thinkexist. com/quotation/the_primary-the_fundamental-the_essential_purpose/344191. html 2. Dixon Kamukama, Rwanda Conflict: Its Roots and Regional Implications Second Edition, (Kampala, Uganda: Fountain Publishers Ltd. , 1997), 3-4. 3. “Purpose and Principles,” in The Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice, ed, United Nations (San Francisco, 1945) 3. 4. Michael Barnett, Eyewitness to Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda, (New York: Cornell University Press, 2003), 2. . United Nations, “Rwanda Genocide and UN’s Contribution”, (Security Council Inquiry, 1999), 7. 6. Neil Riemer, International Peace and Security: The Cost of Waging Peace, (USA: Praeger Publishers, 2000) 63. 7. James S. Sutterlin, The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Security: a Challenge to be Met, Second Edition, (New York: Greenwood Publishing Group Inc. , 2003) 75. 8. Mariano Aguirre, “Power and Paradox in the United Nations,” in Open Democracy (November 2006): accessed October 31, 2011; www. pendemocracy. net/globalization-institutions_government/un_paradox_4073. jsp[->1] 9. “Learning From the Rwandan Genocide of 1994,” National Defense and the Canadian Forces, November 6, 2011, http://www. journal. dnd. ca/vo6/no2/human-humain-eng. asp 10. Dixon Kamukama, Rwanda Conflict: Its Roots and Regional Implications Second Edition, (Kampala, Uganda: Fountain Publishers Ltd. , 1997), 27-30. 11. United Nations, “Rwanda Genocide and UN’s Contribution”, (Security Council Inquiry, 1999), 11. 12. James S.

Sutterlin, The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Security: a Challenge to be Met, Second Edition, (New York: Greenwood Publishing Group Inc. , 2003) 74. 13. United Nations, “Rwanda Genocide and UN’s Contribution”, (Security Council Inquiry, 1999), 9. 14. Karl Maier, Into the House of the Ancestors: Inside the New Africa, (San Francisco:John Wiley, 1998), 273. 15. James S. Sutterlin, The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Security: a Challenge to be Met, Second Edition, (New York: Greenwood Publishing Group Inc. , 2003) 77.

At the forefront globalization and the dramatic turn of events worldwide, the focus of states and government is towards economic stability and human development. These goals are also in conjunction with the goals set forth by the United Nations (UN), in particular, priorities on . More to this, the UN and its subordinate agencies are mandated to extend support and technical services on priority and special cases and at different areas.

These global aspirations are carried out through government collaborations and or at the regional and bilateral level. However, at various junctures, these initiatives are often hampered by interventions driven by conflicts or disputes among nations and or within its people. Most often than not, these conflicts are either anchored or rooted to religious differences which brought about misunderstanding among interest groups. Hence, giving way to bitter resolution—wars and or violence.

Relative to its functions and mandate, ethnic or religious conflicts have been proven to directly or indirectly affect the efforts of UN for international development, peace, justice, security, cooperation, gender equality, human rights and social justice. The domino effect is very apparent and dreaded in this type of conflict. Hence, an integrated approach in harnessing inter-faith communication among world religions and denominations is seen as a key factor in mitigating and or pacifying on-going international or bilateral conflicts.

II. Discussion

Inter-faith communication could be realized in various venues and through different media. In fact, it has itself a long history to stand on its own. This is done usually through inter-faith dialogues. But “inter faith” has always been interpreted in different ways and scope. Many were initiated by a particular group and were limited only to bilateral religions. On a wider range, many international organizations were born out of interfaith dialogues, usually inter-denomination within traditions such as Christianity. An example of which is World Council of Churches, the broadest Christian inter-denomination alliance.

However, this does not include other major religions, not even Islam and the Catholic Church. Hence, a more integrated organization and a broader segment of religion or denomination are needed to establish and institutionalize inter-faith cooperation and understanding. Prior to coming up with this goal, a thorough study of the communication factors, conflict or risk management practices, cooperation and understanding principles as variables used and potentially to be used by different religions or faith is significant to establish the objective set above.

Identifying Communication Factors

This involves the identification of communication factors such as communication gap (language differences, information lapses, assimilation and or misinterpretations. This also allows for a better understanding of the weaknesses of the respective parties in holding dialogues or reaches out initiatives.

Risk or Conflict Management

This variable is a very critical area in dealing with religious conflicts. The assessment of how parties practice conflict or risk management within their line or a counterpart enables possibility of drafting a roadmap for managing conflicts, or employing modifications to existing binding or non-binding policy.

Employing Cooperation and Understanding Principles

This is one of the most important considerations to be looked upon in initiating such critical moves as interfaith communication. Employing acceptable principles for cooperation and understanding enables mutual cooperation from opposing parties (respondents). For this study, denominations/religions in the village level will be the primary target. However, as to the assessment, the key informant will be coming from the hierarchy base or area.

III. Methodology

This research will be using a deductive approach in assessing the variables of the research as well as its implementation. The research will also employ a two-way data gathering scheme, including a key informant interview for religious leaders/elders and a survey among their respective followers and believers.

The key informant interviewee will be asked (through guide questions) about their experience and perception of the variables being considered. The rest of the respondents will also be asked (through guided questionnaire) of their perception and affirmation of the variables in consideration and the affirmation of the leaders’/leaders’ information.

The location of the study is proposed to be conducted in war-torn areas, devastated by ethnic or religious conflicts. The government concerned will be tapped for ensuring safe conduct pass and security and the academes in the conduct of the research respectively.

The length of time for the conduct of the study is dependent on the availability of the respondents and financial and logistical provisions.

The researcher and a pool of experts will look into the data and subject it for analysis. After which, the research results will be published including the recommendations for referral to parties (religions, denominations, governments) involved, relative to UN concerns and work and request for actions to carry out the goals reflected in the research.

IV. Conclusion

Indeed, the need for a benevolent initiative as an alternative to resolve conflict is still the most acceptable to way to resolving global religious-related conflicts. War is not an answer to another war. It only derails and inhibits peace efforts. Hence, this research initiative to further understand and establish interfaith communication is filled with hopes in terms of feasibility and acceptability.

Very recently, there was a global uproar in the Moslem world against the pronouncements of the Pope. Although The Vatican has already been in constant efforts to mitigate further disputes, the threats and tensions are still high. Hence, without proper and peaceful venue for communication, worst may come to worst.

V. Bibliography

(Chicago, 1994). Learning’s for the Future of Inter-Faith Dialogue. http://www.laetusinpraesens.org/docs/diaparl.php.

 (Berlin, 2005). Pope Stresses Interfaith Dialogue. http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,1558435,00.html.

Ariarajah, S. (Geneva, 1991). Interfaith Dialogue.

http://www.wcccoe.org/wcc/what/interreligious/diction.html.

Ashafa,M.N.(Kaduna, 2005). Promoting Interfaith Dialogue.

http://www.amf.net.au/PDF/diversityMatters/Imam-Muhammad-Ashafa.pdf#search=%22Interfaith%20dialogue%22.

Garfinkel, R. (Washington, 2004). What Works? Evaluating Interfaith Dialogue

Programs. http://www.usip.org/pubs/specialreports/sr123.html.

Goth, B. (Australia, 2005). Champion of interfaith dialogue.

http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=3778.

May, D. (2006). Inter-Religious Councils Tackle World’s Conflicts.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0828-04.htm.

Ratanasara, H. (Kentucky, 1996). The Importance of Interfaith Dialogue: A Buddhist

perspective. http://www.urbandharma.org/bcdialog/bcd2/interfaith.htm.

Smock, D. (Harvard, 2004). Divine Intervention: Regional Reconciliation through Faith.

http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o;se=gglsc;d=5002080704;er=deny.

Smock, D. (Washington, 2006). Interfaith Dialogue and

Peacebuilding.http://bookstore.usip.org/books/BookDetail.aspx?productID=5121.

Corruption hurts economies, people, and governments. Corruption is unethical, immoral, and illegal in many societies, religions, and countries. It needs to be stopped. Private organizations, United Nations, and some governments have attempted to stop corruption or at least have tried to prevent it. They have failed. However, eradication of corruption should be the nation’s number-one priority in view of the ever-increasing horizon of political and administrative corruption and its baneful multifarious effects on the society-at-large.

It needs to be understood by all that eradication of corruption is only possible if strong political commitment exists. Without strong political commitment, bureaucratic reorientation and a vibrant and effective civil society, checking corruption turns into a very difficult almost impossible task. Corruption is more in India only because even if they are caught they are coming out in minutes with money or power. so we should have a policy called rule is rule for everyone, even for politicians. Noting that India is presently ranked at 72nd place among 180 countries by the Transparency International in its latest Corruption Perception Index (CPI), the Centre said it has taken several measures and is “moving progressively” to eradicate the menace.

Corruption is prevalent at all levels. Improving transparency and accountability could help reduce corruption substantially. However, this requires stricter laws and regulations. To eradicate corruption from India it’s important to first eradicate corruption from within ourselves.. We should not keep blaming others for the growing rate of corruption in the country but rather see what we have or what we could do to eradicate corruption from India .

First thing to do is to make strict rules and if someone is caught with sth then punish them severely.

How Corruption be eradicated from INDIA?

I narrate Bullet points:

• Revive Moral and cultural values by daily viewing on regional and national Door Darshan during Prime time of real life, practical episodes from lives of Lal Bahadur Shastri, Mahatma Gandhiji, Swami Vivekanand, Saints like Kabir,other regional heroes and torch bearers;
• Reinforce similar programs in schools nd colleges;
• Highlight simplicity of cultural, moral values by eulogising episodes of Awardees like Child Heroes, Teachers, craftsmen, artists, musicians;
• Revise text books in schools and improvise extra curricular to uphold values per above in every school;
• Run educational shorts on mass-media for exhorting citizens for rights, and How and where to access Right to Information;
• Introduce more ” Jan Kalyan ” and P-R in every Govt. Revenue offices, collectorates, etc.
• Improve ” supply side ” economics for Education by doubling schools, Vocational Diplomas, colleges of Medical, Engineering, I.T, as well as distant and On-line educational facilities;
• Improve ” Supply side ” economics for basics like seeds, irrigation, sprinkler irrigation,
• Renewable energy devices like solar, wind for every 10 households to begin with in every village,
• Farmers’ Co-ops for direct marketing to Urban areas;
• Encourage terrace farming of potatoes, etc like in south american Andeas, and Japanese Rice growing techniques in higher altitude regions, etc;
• Involve and encourage more women’s NGOs and gram panchayats to monitor all of above to embolden ‘pro-active’ growth orientation, thus avoiding pitfalls and evils of shortages and contrived “socialism”.