Consciousness

Barbara Jordan uses many repetitions in her speech (e. g. we believe-we believe), symbolism (Barbara Jordan symbolizes the discriminated Black people), enumeration (e. g. race, sex, economic condition), climax (e. g. from cynical to angry to frustrated), Anaphora (e. g. we are a people.. ), parallelism ( But there is something different about tonight. There is something special about tonight), metaphor (deafness) and rhetorical question (If that happens, who then will speak for America? Who then will speak for the common good?

Stylistic devices are effective to me because first, they strongly stressed an idea and that second it caught my attention since they are more interesting to listen to. In fact, the five stylistic uses of language are to create powerful text, to make a lively and interesting text to catch reader’s attention, to stress an idea by unconsciously/consciously penetrating the mind, to coerce and to appeal to emotion. 2. How does Jordan celebrate the Democratic party? What American values does she associate with the Democratic party?

Barbara Jordan celebrates the Democratic Party by pointing it as the political party that most American turned to when they “looked for new ways to solve their problems and to uphold the principles of this nation” (Jordan, 1976). In other words, she describes the Democratic Party as a savior of American problems. This is possible because of the Democratic Party’s concept of governing which believe that “the people are the source of all governmental power and that the authority of the people is to be extended not restricted”(Jordan, 1976).

The Democratic Party upholds the two American values: equality for all and privileges for none and innovation. Equality for all and privileges for none meant that each American are given the opportunity to be heard in a public forum and treated as equal no matter from what backgrounds they came from. There is no room then arising from race, sex and economic condition. The second American value is the love for innovation. This meant that the American welcome change, and are willing to suffer for it, in order to have a better future (Jordan, 1976).

3. Jordan does not attack the opposition (i. e. , the Republicans) which is customary in a keynote address. Do you think this was a wise choice? Why or why not? Barbara Jordan’s decision not to attack the Republican was a wise decision in view of the fact of her admission that their own party had committed many mistakes, mistakes which according to her are not motivated by any deliberate desire to destroy but a “mistake of the heart” (Jordan, 1976).

If she attacks the Republicans then it just make their Party hypocritical and subject them to more vicious counterattack from the Republican Party. Jordan instead takes on the better path of humility, of admission of the mistakes done by the Party and assures the people that the Party is doing its best to correct those mistakes. Moreover, the refusal to attack the Republican just shows the sincere desire of the Democratic Party to achieve national unity in order to have a better future.

I think what Barbara Jordan hoped to achieve in this speech is to gain the American people’s sympathy and support for the Democratic Party through its willingness to admit its faults and at the same time inspiring them to be united for a better future. Reference Jordan, Barbara. (1976, July 12). Democratic Convention Keynote Address. Retrieved July 8, 2008 from http://www. elf. net/bjordan/keynote. html

This is to analyze American Civil War based on James McPherson’s For Cause and Comrades and Sam Watkins Company Aytch, by knowing what were the most important factors that led men to join and stay with the armies. This paper will also consider the ways in which those reasons differed between North and South, and discuss why the resolve to fight largely collapsed in the Confederacy by 1865, while it continued to endure in the North. 2. Analysis and Discussion 2. 1 In general, soldier fought for cause and comrades When people go to war they do not do it for nothing.

Normally nobody wants to go to war hence going to war must have their good reasons for violating their peace. It must be for reason for cause with the belief that reason of because if more important than allowing the other person of party to continue what he or she must be doing. Tolerance is therefore no longer an option hence resolution by bringing to war is the only best option to resolve the situation. What McPherson tried to paint from his work entitled For Cause and Comrades about the reason that men and women may have in going to war. The very title is speaking for reasons in getting to war.

In his work, James McPherson asks that question of the combatants on both sides of the American Civil War. With his subtitle asking the familiar question: “Why did men fight in the American Civil War? ” , one could readily agree that author purposely finds real reason why people go the war. The thesis therefore of this his book is that men and women go to war for cause and for comrade. Allowing the more important word to absorb the less significant one would have reduce the title into War for Cause since doing for comrades is for cause as well.

He must have therefore his own reasons for choosing the title and there might be a need for special emphasis for comrades. Hence, McPherson must have been arguing that the main title states the two most important reasons: a cause moved each of them to enlist, but cohesiveness among comrades sustained them to the end. The author reported to have turned the pages of the diaries and letters of 647 Union and 429 Confederate soldiers, and he followed a simple method by categorizing the reasons and inserting four quotations from letters or diaries for each category.

It may be noted that about each soldier, McPherson provided basic information: whether the soldier fought for the Union or the Confederacy, and when and to whom he wrote. His comments on each set of quotations are thin. His typical entry, early in the first chapter: quoted “I am sick of war,” as written by a Confederate officer to his wife in 1863, and of the severance from the dearest objects of life–his family. 2. 3 Resulting answers based McPherson’s research

McPherson’s work was able to extract fourteen key answers as reasons for going to war and these include martial enthusiasm, comradeship, character, and discipline and leadership religion. Other reasons include defense of homeland and preservation of the union. While further reasons include: liberty, slavery, vengeance, duty, glory, and honor. McPherson found both rebels and Yankees to have given similar reasons, except, as expected , on the subject of slavery.

In doing his topical index, McPherson inserted other attitudes, motives, and types of experiences the soldiers recorded as the same soldiers followed their reasons for fighting which may be adventure, , desertion, cowardice, the draft, skulking, coercion, desertion. The other reasons for fighting include pursuit of promotion, combat stress, rage, poor morale and homesickness. Using some principles from the work of John A. Lynn, McPherson was steered by three categories of motivation: First is initial motivation, followed by sustaining motivation and finally combat motivation.

It was found out the group cohesion and peer pressure were indeed powerful factors in combat motivation and were also connected to the multifaceted mixture of concepts of duty, honor, patriotism , ideology, community of peer pressure and manhood that prompted these soldiers enlist in the army, first place. McPherson then argued for a more relevant relationship among these three categories for Civil War soldiers compared with others’ work major appeal of this book is the purely interesting, sometimes awesome, but always brief stories the soldiers tell to express their reasons for fighting.

2. 4 Is there basis to take Soldiers’ Writings at Face Value? McPherson had asked questions whose answers appear from the dairies and letters of soldiers he reviewed . He is therefore, inclined to take what they say at face value. From an objective historian’s point of view, it may be asked whether there is basis to take the writings at their face value. By making his title: For Cause of Comrades, McPherson appeared to have taken upon himself that what he got from the diaries and letter is really what the authors to communicate.

As a general rule a diary is something personal where if the issue is truthfulness of its contents, this researcher therefore would like to give credence the validity of those events happening with the official function of the knowledge as made known to the faculties. Although McPherson’s findings represented to have the many letters, he was just trying to extract the motives from those statements. It may be argued that people react differently to situations and reactions to situations could be numerous or the context from which statements were made do really vary hence they could be capable of different meanings.

Psychology is different field from law. Although in both field, motives may be used to predict behavior, the predicted behavior may really vary from the actual result. Trying to infer what was the motive by reading statements would have the characteristics of being speculative. If speculation could be away of learning for something that will come then by all means it should used not sparingly since the cost could be higher if futures are not studied well in the content of agreement. Motives as used by McPherson has catalogued are not the same as actual events as proved evidence.

Realities cannot be equated with simple extraction from testimonies found in letters or diaries. The same argument may hold even by a quantitative statistical analysis of all the letters ever written, combined with sociological, cultural, linguistic, and psychological, principles. It may therefore be safely deduced that motives standing by themselves and by their very nature, possess few of the necessary attributes of fact. One could accept the at the most what could be done in the diaries and letters is just the option of speculation. Fortunately but speculation as sometime done have become useful sometimes.

One could therefore speculate on the motive for fighting based on reading the from the testimony of soldiers on their motives for fighting, in terms of the level of consciousness motive as they say their own piece of their own stories. In psychology many thing is possible as it could be possible that while at certain time, the writer’s conscious motive is to reassure, it is also possible that his unconscious motive is self-delusion. If the soldier asks his own self why he needs to the joining the draft, and thereby answered is religion, then such is a prerogative of any person.

Taking the words of soldiers at their face value must be given credence given this may even be sustained in the court of law. In law the express meanings of the word are given preference over the implied meaning. The probability therefore that contents of the diaries are true is more than not has a good chance of being upheld. 2. 5 Questions based on Answers McPherson’s latest study on the motives of soldiers from their letters and diaries may be considered as an achievement itself as for further exploration and speculation.

Having perhaps taken a necessary first step, while none of the reasons he gives are new, he has assembled together many colorful testimonials of soldier who have the chance to be part of the actual war. He just set to do the laying out of they soldier’s own stated reason and he must be given credit for thoroughly doing in good order, and in a readable style. But to consider his approach, as if it has accomplished everything or in a context where he has already provided almost the final answers would be too simplistic.

To substitute what could otherwise be an inherently complex dynamic issue where other researcher’s may take several steps further a powerful lead to further research. Some of the questions that could be asked form his work include: Is the person talking or writing a ranking or non-ranking soldier. Is the same soldier from the South or from the North. His work may not be fully compared with the work of Sam Watkins who was part of the Confederates. Having a person interpreting what other people are saying is different form having the person who actually did it to say.

To the appreciate the concept, having a person to testify in court will carry more wait than a mere affidavit of a deposition taken from that person. Sam Watkins may therefore have the chance to write the most famous and most complex memoirs in “Co. Aytch” as one who was there could actually explain it more fully. The other question that could be asked included the place where the soldier is at the time he writes. This could be Winter quarters, his home, a hospital or a even prison or on a ship. Another angle is the reason for writing which is the immediate reason. Does the writer write to reassure?

to reproach? to brag and to justify? Having perhaps answered to these question would make separate research that would further really explain that is causing people to go to war. The fact that one writes in a letter, a diary, or a memoir where each is different from the other. To have a deeper truth is to ask the author to whom does he write? This will normally taking to a mother, a grandmother, a father, a grandfather, a brother, a sister, a uncle, a aunt, a cousin. The following individuals people such a friend, a sweetheart, a politician, a teacher, a wife, a little child, or even fellow soldier.

What is logical is a different rhetoric is aimed at each person in this array of types. It is therefore logical to a writer to anticipate the response of his audience. If the audience is one of a variety of people or oneself, a relevant question is would include trying to persuade with such rhetoric, oneself or the other person, or both. Answers to these many questions would provide a complex setting for answers to the question McPherson poses. He doesn’t pose these related questions; he does not, therefore, attempt to answer them.

He has acquitted himself well of an historian’s task: to state a subject that deserves research, uncover what’s in the record, and then give a report of the matter. But one should not expect an historian to deal with questions that can be answered most effectively by experts in other disciplines. Most questions about the Civil War are simplistically posed and simplistically answered, because each question is asked is isolation of all or most others, and asked from the perspective of a single discipline. The Civil War in most of its aspects defies single-perspective explanations.

Answers to McPherson’s question are most useful after the most perspectives have been brought to bear. This is a task of interdisciplinary study: psychology, linguistic anthropology, statistical analysis, cultural geography, religion, political science, social science, literary criticism, military science, etc. No one discipline serves well enough. Such is the art of making further studies in the work of others . The relevancy of questions posed will have now to consider the possibilities for multidisciplinary approaches to address such complex questions.

The McPherson’s book appendixes points the way to the larger, more complex job to be done. There is indeed the need for more direct interpretation of McPherson’s quotations in light of such information is needed. The presence of geographical distribution of white Confederate and of white Union soldiers and their occupations, a provide a mutual misunderstanding. It could thus be asserted the Civil War, was a class war–a rich man’s war, but a poor man’s fight. What come s next is the unanswerable question that remained? What were the reasons of the poor and illiterate, the white, the black and the foreign born to fight in going to War.

3 Conclusions The most important factors that led men to join and stay with armies vary but according to McPherson’s For Cause and Comrades, basically there must be a cause that is defined with the individual level. Fighting for comrades is a cause itself but other soldiers have expressed these reasons in other ways which McPherson was able to extract and categorized from the letters and diaries and soldiers involved in the war. McPherson has provided readers with the means to start on asking major questions whose answer may be applied to later years such as the reconstruction era.

The same answers may also illuminate one’s understanding of the evolution of the American character from 1865 to the current chapter in our history. The answers may be used also to deal with the legacy of violence, racism, distrust of government, and economic instability, in understanding the lives that Americans have in understanding others who are enduring or surviving the crucible of Civil War around the globe. Understanding the why men and women of past fight may help the Americans to deal with those wars from within and from without more effectively.

Knowledge of inner reasons is good starting point of really doing a research that points the wisdom of learning from experience. The value if learning is therefore not to commit the same mistake. The book of Watkinson the other hand was written by a Confederate private who served in the Army of Tennessee for nearly the entirety of the Civil War. Having been extracted from diaries of the author during the war, it carries more credence than that of McPherson since this memoir of civil war experiences from a private’s perspective is priceless in terms of primary source material.

Watkins was found to be frank and impenitent, thus his book is possessed of a quality that gives the historian with unique material in terms of dealing with the sentiments that the non-elite confederates often held. Watkins’s frankness is almost certainly the most important feature of this work. His hatred of Yankees and the same level as his hatred of some of the Confederate command proposes an individual who most likely defies current simple philosophy of Yankee/Rebel mentality. Watkins is often amusing, especially when reflecting upon feelings that we would now understand as being imbedded in “class struggle”.

Of course, Watkins’s frankness extends to his views of blacks and slaves, illuminating an individual who was both racist and yet not in the generally held conventional manner. This paper also considered the ways in which those reasons differed between North and South, and is making a resolution why the resolve to fight largely collapsed in the Confederacy by 1865, while it continued to endure in the North. The earlier collapse in the Confederacy by 1965 may be explained by the fact that the Conferacy often used slaves as naval crewmembers and soldiers, the African American soldiers were paid less than white soldiers.

And the African American soldiers were discriminated against and served in segregated units under the command of white officers. It may be given emphasis that the knowledge of knowing the motivation of soldiers would be a good way to prevent a destruction of life that must come out of the war. It is said that not any one really win in war in perfect manner for whoever goes of war faces the risk of possible loss of life. Work Cited: McPherson , For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War (Paperback) Oxford University Press, USA, Aug 28, 1998 Watkins, and Inge, Company Aytch, Plume; Subsequent edition (November 1, 1999)

Over the past seven years I have come to learn many different things about myself and about children due to babysitting. I first started babysitting when I was a about eleven years of age.

I started off by watching my younger brothers when my parents went out at night. That affected my biological rhythm (274). My body was used to going to sleep around nine o’clock since I was still young, but I had to force myself to stay up so I could watch over my brothers while they slept. I sometimes found myself staying up till about midnight! Since I was so tired from staying up it seemed to have an affect on my sleeping also.It seemed like I would have more dreams that I could vividly remember the next morning (280). The next couple of nights after I babysat, it seemed like by body was on REM rebound due to the stages of REM sleep I would miss (276). Now that I am older I have trained my body to be able to stay awake and not feel like I had sleep derivation the next day (280).

During the duration of training my body to stay awake late, I learned a few things the hard way. I first thought that if I drank a lot of caffeine I would be able to stay awake longer and easier.Well that thought nearly ruined me! It wasn’t soon after I started relying on caffeine that my body became tolerant to it, and it seemed like I couldn’t go sleep without it or wake up without it (297)! At first it seemed like I was going through a withdrawal period (297). My body was craving the caffeine so badly that I felt sick without it. From that experience I have learned that doing homework or talking on the phone helps me stay awake while I am waiting on the children’s parents to get home. I am lucky that I have only suffered from addiction to caffeine and not drugs.A friend of mine became addicted to cocaine due to having to stay awake late for school.

When she took that drug she said it made her feel like she could stay awake forever. To stay awake that is what a person wants to feel. Cocaine addiction is a fast track from euphoria to crash (301). Through my many years of experience in babysitting I have learned that most children fall under the category of associative learning. Associative learning is learning that certain events occur together (315). For example with most children after everything they do there is some sort of consequence.Younger kids have a tendency to get into things that they shouldn’t.

Therefore, after they get into something that is off limits, they get in trouble. After watching kids fall under that category I also realized that many adults fall under it also. It seems like after every action there is a consequence. Here are some examples of kids actions and the responses they get. When a kid eats or drinks, automatically they have to use pee or poop afterwards. That is an example of unconditioned response (317). The substance the kid puts in their mouth is the unconditioned stimulus (317).

A kid has to use the restroom soon after they eat because they haven’t quite learned how to control their urges. That is why they sometimes also go the bathroom in their pants. I learned a lot about babysitting through observational learning. Observational learning is observing and intimating others (341). When I was younger and I was unable to baby sit, a close family friend used to come over and watch my brothers and I. I learned a lot of from her. I learned many games from her that I now play with the kids I baby-sit.

That comes in handy when I try to keep all of the kids occupied.Another thing that I learned from her that comes in handy when babysitting is patience. Patience plays a very big role. Kids repeat things over and over again, in other words they don’t know when to quit. That turns into getting on my nerves a lot. I have learned not to let it bother me as much. I have taught myself to take a deep breath when that happens and try to get the kids minds on something else.

There are two different kinds of reinforcement I use with the kids while I baby-sit. They are positive and negative reinforcement (329).I use positive reinforcement when the kids do something that is good. For example, if they clean off their plates after they eat and get everything ready for bed, I will give them a good night treat. If the kids do something bad or if they go against what I tell them to do, I use negative reinforcement. Negative reinforcement may be they do not get a good night treat, they have to go to bed a half an hour early, or I may even give a bad report to their parents. I only give a bad report to the parents if they didn’t listen to me at all, or if they continued to back talk me.

I find a lot that latent learning occurs a lot with the kids also (334). While I am baby-sitting I try to teach the kids something new every time. Sometimes they pick it right up other times it takes a while. For example, I try to teach the kids to always wash their hands before and after they eat. I teach them by making a point to let them know what I am doing when I wash my hands. Soon after, I will catch one of the kids trying to reach the facet to turn it on so they can wash their hands. When it comes to the kids memory, its not very long.

It seems like to me that kids only remember things if they really want it. Other than that, they have short term memory. Short term memory is when you learn something but shortly afterwards you forget what it is (362). For example, when I am helping the kids clean up their room I try to tell them where stuff goes so that they can do it on their own. Well every time it comes to clean up time, they don’t remember where anything goes. When ever the kids do remember what I have said or taught them, they are retrieving memories from storage. Storage is the heart of memory (361).

Through all of my years of baby-sitting and experiences, I have learned many things about myself and about the kids I watch. I am now able to predict what certain kids are going to do or say at a certain time. I have gotten to know each of their personalities and became familiar with they things they like and the things they don’t like. I am also familiar with the things they know and what things they do not know. Through everything the kids put me through and taught me, I have learned a very important thing about myself. I love working with kids and that is what I hope to do in life regardless of what field it is in.

Well all know that completing a long exam can feel like running a mental marathon, but did you know that what you eat and drink can affect your exam performanceWell it’s true – certain foods have been scientifically proven to improve your energy levels, concentration rate and overall brain power; sounds exactly like the kind of thing you could use for an exam rightToday we have a look at what is the best diet to follow on exam day?

Eat brain-boosting foods

Protein-rich foods can lead to greater mental alertness, these include eggs, nuts, yogurt, and cottage cheese. So the ideal pre-exam breakfast would be whole-grain cereal with low-fat milk, eggs and toast with jam, porridge, oatmeal, or sugar-free muesli.

Go Bananas

Fruit can provide excellent brain fuel, which can help you think faster and remember more easily. You could eat oranges, strawberries, blueberries, or bananas, which are especially popular. Vegetables, raw carrots, bell peppers, Brussels sprouts, spinach, broccoli, and asparagus are good choices.

Brain blockers

On exam day, stay away from foods made of white flour, such as cookies, cakes, and muffins, which require added time and energy to digest. Also avoid foods that are high in refined sugar, such as chocolates, desserts, and sweets.

When eaten alone, carbohydrates make you feel more relaxed than alert. So carbs are a good option for the day before the exam, but not on the actual exam day. In addition, carbs such as rice or potatoes, eaten in large quantities, can make you feel heavy and sleepy.

Avoid foods that a high in sugar, such as chocolate and Coca-Cola. They will send you off on sugar highs and lows — the opposite of stabilising you during your long exam.

Drink brain boosting beverages.

Make sure you drink enough water before and during your exam. Tea also works, though without a lot of sugar. Dehydration can make you lose your concentration, feel faint, and sap your energy. Don’t wait till you’re thirsty to drink a glass of water. If you wait till you’re thirsty, it means your body is already a little dehydrated.

Avoid alcohol completely on exam day. Obviously, you cannot do well on an exam if you are drunk, have a headache, or are feeling nauseous. In general, reduce your drinking around exam time to avoid hangovers, dullness, or excessive fatigue. Avoid caffeine, as it can increase your nervousness..

Consider taking multivitamins.

Most students do not eat a healthy balanced diet. When you survive on pizza, junk food, Red Bull, and coffee, your body ends up with a lack of essential vitamins and minerals. A multivitamin can help. The B vitamins especially strengthen brain functioning. Iron, calcium, and zinc can boost your body’s ability to handle stress.

Don’t Forget to Sleep.

Many students get into the habit of studying late into the night, hoping to cram in a little more information into their already exhausted brains. Instead, on the night before the exam, stop studying in the early evening. After that, take it easy, eat your dinner, lay out your clothes for the next day, pack your bag, take a shower, set a couple of alarms and head to bed early. You’ve done all you can. To function at your best on exam day, you need not only the energy that comes from healthy nutrition, but also the energy that comes from adequate, restful sleep.

The yon notion of dressing up can be defined as an action done by humans to cover naturism. Social forces pressure people to interact, behave, or think in certain ways. The way people dress influences their daily lifestyle, in their small circles and even in the wider society.

Is the only purpose of clothes to cover people up and keep them warm?

Far from it, what people wear is a reflection of more or less conscious choice. It expresses humans desire to seduce, convince, to show discretion or convey any message related to everyday circumstances. The fact that people are born naked does not dismiss the powerful effect clothing has on how they perceive themselves and the world around them.in this essay the writer is going to discuss how the clothes we wear are sort of armour that sends message to individuals subconscious and to the individuals they interact with/avoid every day.

There is more to people’s clothing choices than they might imagine. For many people, what they wear is nothing more than a matter of habit, but when you dress in the morning it might pay to be a little more careful in the choices you make. Doing a different thing with your clothes might be a way of changing the impression others have of you. Clothes make a big difference in what others think of you, things you could’ve never imagined or even thought about.

People make their own assessments about how they are going to talk to you and what kind of a person you are to how much respect they are going to give you within a few seconds of seeing one another. Those assessments go beyond how well the person is dressed and how tidy and neat they look. The way you dress has a huge impact on how you are viewed in the society. Whether you are at work , in school or just walking at a shopping center, the society is quick to judge a person according to their physical appearance “outside” which steals away the opportunity of knowing the real character of that person “inside”.

It is very important for people to choose their style of dressing up because people will make all sort of assumptions about you without proper evidence. Clothes play the key role in people’s daily lives from how they are treated to how they are potrayed. In the society people have to try to present themselves in a manner in which they are ready to be judged. If you are going to attend a formal meeting dressed in torn jeans you are making another person wonder how you got the job. Same as a person at corner of the street begging for money should not be surprised if people do not give him any money if he is dressed in clean clothes and looking tidy. In the society you have to dress the part if you want to get what you want.

Clothing do not only correlate with people’s emotional state but it also alters it as well. Some outfits can make people feel amazing while others render people uncertain. It turns out that there is some real logic behind this phenomenon. There is a huge link between clothing choices and emotional state.

An extra effort is taken when dressing up especially when it comes with receiving extra compliments. Whether you woke up feeling ready for everything or total opposite, the clothes you choose reflects your mood even if you were not aware of it.

Feeling down or sad?

White the mental state most definitely affects the way we dress, how we cope in days of depression/stress can be affected by the way you are dressed. How you cope in days of depression/stress if strongly affected by the way you dress.

Any kind of clothing associated with a specific role activates your knowledge and expectations about how people from that profession should behave. For example, Wearing coats and uniforms raise consciousness to people about what their duties are and they become encouraged to pay more attention to their work. Just wearing a suit during a meeting encourages people to be professional and to be more cautious and avoid bad decision making.

This does not only apply to adults, but also school children who attend school wearing school uniforms performs better because the uniform makes school work more real and valuable to children and parents. Uniforms also acts as sort of a boundary between the person their personality for example, A person in a suits would be expected to act professional and speak/engage professionally in everything which restricts a person’s application in things.

In conclusion, this essay has shown that clothes always matter, from their functional role to the role they play in the society. The ordinary act of protecting the body from different weather conditions and covering human shame has turned into a statement that describes who we are and how we live. The clothes people wear are really a choice of theirs.

There is no wrong or write when it comes to dressing up, but it is always about how confident the person is in what they are wearing. It is very important to know that your clothes and presentation pass certain messages across about you as a person. It does not matter whether you are just an ordinary person who dresses ordinary, it is more about intentional and unconscious communication through clothing choices.